Pitt women go cold in 2nd half, drop opener to Princeton |

Pitt women go cold in 2nd half, drop opener to Princeton

Karen Price

Even with a handful of freshmen and only one returning starter, Pitt women’s coach Suzie McConnell-Serio still had high expectations of her team heading into the season opener against Princeton on Friday.

Those expectations were not even close to being met.

The Panthers led by a point at the break but missed their first 11 shots of the second half watched the Tigers go on a 16-0 run and the offense never recovered enough to dig out of the hole in a 59-43 loss at Petersen Events Center.

“Honestly, I don’t think I could be more disappointed with our performance,” McConnell-Serio said. “From an offensive perspective, this performance was not indicative of what I’ve seen from these players as individuals and through practices, and the scrimmage and the exhibition game. Just trying to do too much, not playing within themselves, not playing as a team. We always talk about how important team chemistry is, and I didn’t see a lot of that on the floor today.”

Senior point guard Brianna Kiesel scored nine of her team-high 14 points in the final eight minutes to spark the Panthers, who cut their deficit from 20 points with 10:39 to play to just eight with 4:48 remaining.

Freshman forward Yacine Diop, a Seton-La Salle product, grabbed the rebound from Kiesel’s missed free throw and scored to make it 47-39, but Princeton answered with a layup. The Tigers then went to the line for another six points on four Panthers fouls.

Pitt, which shot 36.9 percent from the floor last season, finished 16 of 63 (25.4 percent). Kiesel was the only player in double figures. Freshman forward Stasha Carey contributed nine points and 11 rebounds in her Division I debut.

Kiesel is the lone returning starter for Pitt, which went 11-20 last season. Diop and Carey are true freshmen, sophomore guard Fred Potvin played a minimal role last season and guard Monica Wignot, a graduate student, spent the past four years playing volleyball for the Panthers.

However, McConnell-Serio wasn’t using inexperience as an excuse.

Not after Pitt overcame an early 12-3 deficit to take a 20-19 lead at intermission on Kiesel’s 3-pointer just before the buzzer.

The inability to execute and knock down shots means the Panthers may have to try pressing Niagara on Monday.

“We did a better job of being able to put points on the board after we picked up the defensive pressure,” McConnell-Serio said. “Being shorthanded, you don’t know if we can handle that tempo for 40 minutes, but it’s obviously something we have to consider.”

Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at [email protected] or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.