Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt women set tone early in 85-64 rout of Michigan | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt women set tone early in 85-64 rout of Michigan

Karen Price
| Thursday, November 20, 2014 10:00 p.m.

It wasn’t as though the Pitt women knocked off Connecticut or Notre Dame, but Thursday night’s 85-64 victory over Michigan at Petersen Events Center was an important one for the Suzie McConnell-Serio era.

This wasn’t a mid-major team that the Panthers dominated from start to finish, or even a struggling ACC team.

This was Michigan (2-1), with four starters back from a team that went 20-14 overall last season and 8-8 in the Big Ten that advanced to the third round of the WNIT.

This was a good team that Pitt (2-1) beat, and less than a week after McConnell-Serio said she couldn’t be more disappointed following a season-opening loss to Princeton in which they scored just 43 points. They scored that in the first half Thursday.

“Where do I begin? This was a great win for our team,” McConnell-Serio said. “We got off to a great start offensively and defensively. Brianna Kiesel set the tone and made the game easy for everyone else tonight. Being able to knock down shots, find a rhythm and being a playmaker, she was so impressive tonight and her teammates fed off that.”

Kiesel, coming off the only game of her career in which she failed to score a field goal, led the Panthers with 27 points, one shy of tying her career high, and was 6 of 9 from 3-point range.

Freshman forward Stasha Carey once again proved why McConnell-Serio expected her to make an immediate impact.

Coming off a win against Niagara in which Carey had 17 points and 16 rebounds, she finished with 14 points and nine rebounds while guarding Michigan forward Cyesha Goree, who had just eight points and five rebounds.

Both were in double figures in scoring after the first half, with Carey logging 12 points on 5 of 5 shooting from the field and Kiesel scored 11 to pass Taneisha Harrison (1,372, 2007-11) and become Pitt’s ninth all-time leading scorer.

By the end of the game freshman Aysia Bugg (12 points, five assists), who made her first start, and sophomore Fred Potvin (15 points, four assists) had joined them.

Kiesel said this probably was the biggest win of her Panthers career.

“It was a really good win for us,” she said. “We lost to them last year, so this was our revenge. It feels good.”

The Panthers also forced 20 turnovers and set a program record for 3-pointers made in a game with 13, beating the old total of 12 set at Central Michigan on Dec. 31, 2010.

“Our post players can really pass,” said Potvin of the open looks they got all night. “Monica Wignot had eight assists and no turnovers. She can really see us on the court. She drives the defense and then we’re wide open.”

The Panthers opened the game 5 of 7 shooting from the field and 3 of 4 from 3-point range for an early 15-7 lead. Pitt led 43-28 at intermission.

Michigan won last year’s meeting 83-75.

“It’s a Big Ten matchup and they went to the WNIT and won two games,” McConnell-Serio said. “We went up there a year ago and lost to them, and we’re a completely different team.”

Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at kprice@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.