Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt’s Conner, WVU’s White named Maxwell Award semifinalists | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt’s Conner, WVU’s White named Maxwell Award semifinalists

Tribune-Review
| Monday, November 3, 2014 10:48 a.m

Pitt running back James Conner and West Virginia wide receiver Kevin White on Monday were named two of 20 semifinalists for the 78th Maxwell Award, giving annually to the player of the year in college football.

Conner, who leads the nation in yards rushing (1,342) entering the final month of the season, also has scored 17 touchdowns in nine games for Pitt (4-5). He is one of only two sophomores on the Maxwell list, along with Florida State redshirt sophomore quarterback Jameis Winston, the reigning Heisman Trophy winner.

White, a senior, has recorded 75 receptions for 1,075 yards and 8 touchdowns for No. 24 West Virginia (6-3).

Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te’o, who won the Maxwell in 2012, is the only non-quarterback to win the award since Penn State running back Larry Johnson in 2002.

Three finalists for the 2014 award will be named Nov. 24, and the winner will be announced Dec. 11 at the Home Depot College Football Awards Show on ESPN. The formal presentation will occur March 6 at the Maxwell banquet in Atlantic City, N.J.

Also, Conner and teammate T.J. Clemmings were named co-ACC offensive back and lineman of the week, with quarterback Jameis Winston and tackle Cameron Erving, both of Florida State. Conner and Clemmings have earned the conference weekly honors three times this season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.