Pitt’s Pat Narduzzi: Penn State offense similar despite changes |

Pitt’s Pat Narduzzi: Penn State offense similar despite changes

Penn State quarterback Trace McSorley runs for a touchdown against Appalachian State on Saturday, Sept. 1, 2018.

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi’s video study of Penn State’s offense under new coordinator Ricky Rahne hasn’t unveiled many new wrinkles.

“Very similar still,” Narduzzi said.

Penn State has scored nine touchdowns in the past two games against Pitt — all by running back Saquon Barkley (seven) and tight end Mike Gesicki (two), who are both in the NFL. Joe Moorhead, the coach who coordinated those scoring drives, is now the head coach at Mississippi State.

The personnel has changed around senior quarterback Trace McSorley, who has thrown for 496 yards and four touchdowns in the two games, but Narduzzi said the attack hasn’t.

“Just as many RPOs (run/pass options), especially when you get down to the red zone,” he said.

“We’re going to see a lot of RPOs with (offensive) linemen 7 yards down the field (illegally),” he said. “No calls. That’s kind of what it is.”

For the record, Narduzzi has remarked in the past — not just this week — about linemen getting away with running downfield on RPOs that turn into pass plays.

It’s something to keep an eye on, he said.

“(Teams) read a (linebacker, who comes up too quickly) and pop it over his head and get you in man coverage,” he said.

McSorley is good at that because he’s a threat to run. He has scored 20 touchdowns in three seasons.

The game may hinge on what Pitt’s front seven, probably its best group of players on either side of the ball, can do to stop McSorley and running back Miles Sanders (Woodland Hills).

“Don’t sleep on that guy,” Narduzzi said of Sanders, who was Barkley’s backup. “He’s gotten bigger and stronger in the offseason. Catching the ball out of the backfield.

“Sometimes when you watch a guy for so long, you back him up, you start to look like him. He showed some flashes on tape. You’re like, ‘Oh, gosh, where is this guy going to be in another year?’ Is he going to be another Barkley? That’s what he looks like right now.”

“It’s called development. It’s what we do as coaches.”

Whether it’s Sanders taking a handoff or McSorley keeping the football or throwing it, Narduzzi vows his defense will be ready.

“We have a little package for what they do in the red zone with some of their RPOs,” he said.

If Penn State tries to take advantage of Pitt’s speed on defense by running screens and reverses and trying to get defenders out of position, Narduzzi said it’s nothing he hasn’t seen before.

“That’s what they always do. That’s college football,” he said. “That’s the spread. We expect to see a lot of that spread.”

It remains to be seen if Narduzzi will give his quarterback, sophomore Kenny Pickett, the same freedoms McSorley enjoys. But he did say they carry the same characteristics.

“Two guys who love the game of football, smart, athletic can make plays with their feet, make plays with their arms.”

Pickett, 6-foot-2, 220 pounds, is 2 inches taller and 19 pounds heavier than McSorley’s listed height and weight. But the most significant difference between the quarterbacks is the most obvious.

“He has years on Kenny. He has game experience,” Narduzzi said. “He’s been there before and played in big games and made big plays in big games, too. He’s learned from the mistakes he’s made.

“They are similar guys. Good thing for them and good thing for us for the future.”

But for one night, the experience factor at quarterback might be the ultimate difference in the teams.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.