ShareThis Page
Stallings: Players have committed to staying at Pitt |

Stallings: Players have committed to staying at Pitt

| Wednesday, April 6, 2016 11:36 a.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
New Pitt men's basketball coach Kevin Stallings speaks during a news conference Monday, March 28, 2016, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
New Pitt's men's basketball coach Kevin Stallings speaks during a news conference Monday, March 28, 2016, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt assistant coach Brandin Knight

Pitt men’s basketball coach Kevin Stallings said Wednesday he will finalize his coaching staff this week, but he doesn’t expect to retain anyone from the previous staff under former coach Jamie Dixon.

Stallings already hired longtime Vanderbilt assistant Tom Richardson. He said his other two assistants will have strong recruiting backgrounds.

“My desire with the other two positions will be guys that absolutely have a primary recruiting focus,” Stallings said during a one-on-one with the Tribune-Review. “(Athletic director) Scott Barnes said he wanted one. I want two more kick-butt recruiters.”

Stallings said discussions with longtime Panthers assistant and former player Brandin Knight to keep Knight on staff included a “sizeable pay raise” and touched on changing his title to associate head coach, but Knight declined to pursue other options.

Later Wednesday, Jon Rothstein of CBS Sports reported Stallings was set to hire Illinois State assistant Jeremy Ballard.

Stallings, who conducted a second team workout Wednesday, said he received assurances from every player on the roster that no one is planning to transfer.

“I (can) honestly look at the nine guys we have here on scholarship and could see each and every one of them being in the rotation and being effective,” Stallings said.

That includes freshman Damon Wilson, a four-star recruit who appeared in 30 games but averaged only 3.3 points and 1.1 rebounds and shot 34.5 percent from the field.

Stallings said he isn’t considering switching the lanky, 6-foot-5 Wilson, who struggled with his outside shot, from point guard.

“I think he’s absolutely a point guard. Damon is a guy who next year could take a big leap. He certainly could be that guy,” Stallings said. “I like how he can get downhill and get to the basket.”

Stallings said leading scorers Michael Young and Jamel Artis, both juniors, aren’t thinking about leaving school early for the pros.

“They both indicated to me with 100 percent certainty that they’re coming back,” said Stallings, who expects both players to expand their games. “Even if it was just from a consistency standpoint.

“I’ve already issued challenges to Mike and Jamel. If you guys want to play at the next level, here are some things I’ve heard (you need to improve).”

Stallings said the door is open for incoming recruits Justice Kithcart, Crisshawn Clark and Corey Manigault to play right away next season.

“If a freshman comes in, and he’s the best guy to help us win, he’ll be the guy,” Stallings said. “All three of them could be in the mix.”

Stallings said he is familiar with Kithcart from when he recruited Kithcart at Vanderbilt.

“He’s a tough, fast kid with a really good motor,” Stallings said.

Stallings said he would consider filling Pitt’s final scholarship for next season with a high school player or a transfer and didn’t rule out that player being a graduate transfer.

“We’re going to try to fill it. I’d love to get somebody to come in and impact our team,” Stallings said. “We’d like to find another big. Those are the hardest guys to find.”

John Harris is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @jharris_trib.

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.