ShareThis Page
Time to shine for experienced Pitt offensive line |

Time to shine for experienced Pitt offensive line

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, August 6, 2014 9:30 p.m
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt offensive lineman T.J. Clemmings (left), Matt Rotheram (center) and Artie Rowell practice Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014, on the South Side.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt offensive lineman Adam Bisnowaty practices Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014, on the South Side.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt center Artie Rowell prepares to snap the ball to quarterback Chad Voytik on Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014, on the South Side.

Pitt center Artie Rowell noticed something different on the first day of training camp.

The shine was still on the helmets when coaches kept hurling tasks and plays of increasing difficulty at the offensive linemen, without fear of knowledge overload.

“Normally, you start with one or two plays,” said Rowell, a junior from Harrisburg. “We started with several.”

That sounds like a small victory, but at Pitt, it’s bigger than you think.

Since the day nearly three years ago when coach Paul Chryst introduced himself to his team for the first time, Pitt’s coaches have waited patiently for the situation that is in front of them.

The offensive linemen are bigger and stronger than at any time in Chryst’s three seasons, and there are plenty of guys — enough for three complete units for the first time.

“We are sitting on top of each other (in the meeting room),” offensive line coach Jim Hueber said.

Most important, however, is this: They have been around long enough that they finally get it.

The five regulars have started a total of 64 games, led by guard Matt Rotheram’s 27. Four have been to all three of Chryst’s camps.

Sophomores Adam Bisnowaty, Dorian Johnson and backup guard Gabe Roberts know no other way than how Hueber teaches it. Finally, the message is consistent.

“This is my fourth camp,” said Rowell, who was recruited in 2011, “and it feels like my fourth camp.”

Hueber said he has seen growth — mentally as much as physically — in several of his players.

“You look at Artie,” Hueber said. “He has a confidence in what we are doing. He thinks with us.”

Then, there is senior tackle T.J. Clemmings, a defensive end under former coaches Dave Wannstedt and Todd Graham. Clemmings played offensive tackle last season for the first time, and his inexperience showed.

Yet he works harder than most of his teammates, and coaches named him the most improved player on offense the past two springs.

“T.J., you could see it coming in the spring and summer,” Hueber said. “You could see it in the way he carries himself.

“There is less self-doubt. When you move to a new position, that is always there and I think he is over that.”

Now, after determining the Pitt offensive linemen care, work hard and no longer can use inexperience as an excuse, this question remains:Can they play?

Pitt quarterbacks were sacked 43 times last season, and starter Tom Savage ended the season with a bruised kidney.

Chryst is quick to point out that blame for every sack can’t be placed on the linemen’s shoulders. Quarterbacks hold the ball too long; pass catchers don’t get open fast enough.

The line finally has stability, but that’s only half of the story.

“That’s where we really want to be,” Chryst said. “But we’ve got to be better.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.