ShareThis Page
Undermanned Niagara upsets Pitt to snap losing streak |

Undermanned Niagara upsets Pitt to snap losing streak

Pittsburgh's Malik Ellison (3) shoots after getting by Niagara's Greg Kuakumensah (15) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game, Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)
Pittsburgh's Sidy N'Dir (11) shoots between Niagara's James Towns (5) and Keleaf Tate (2) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game, Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)
Pittsburgh's Terrell Brown, left, dunks in front of Niagara's Greg Kuakumensah (15) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game, Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)
Kene Chukwuka (15) bocks a shot by Niagara's James Towns (5) during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game, Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Niagara came into the Petersen Events Center on Monday night, burdened by a three-game losing streak and hampered by the absence of leading scorer and rebounder Marvin Prochet.

So, of course, Niagara (3-4) was the dominant team for much of the nonconference game on their way to a 71-70 victory.

Pitt had a chance to win the game at the buzzer, but Xavier Johnson’s short jumper rolled around the rim and fell out.

Only moments previously, Pitt could have taken the lead or tied the score, but Jared Wilson-Frame missed consecutive shots — a 3-point attempt and a 2-pointer — in the final 23 seconds.

After Niagara’s Greg Kuakumensah hit two free throws to boost the lead to 71-67, Wilson-Frame hit a 3-pointer and Pitt forced a turnover to set up Johnson’s final shot.

Johnson led all scorers with 19 points, and Trey McGowens and Au’Diese Toney added 12 each. Kaleaf Tate scored 17 for Niagara of the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference.

Pitt (7-2) had a chance to match its victory total for all of last season, but the Panthers played out of control for much of the game and committed 17 turnovers by the halfway point of the second half and finished it with 18. Pitt came into the game averaging 12.6 per game.

Niagara center and North Catholic graduate Dominic Robb, who came into the game leading the nation in blocks per game (four), scored 12 points and added five blocks. He fouled out with 3 minutes, 15 seconds left to play.

Niagara’s largest lead was 64-52 with 7:10 left in the second half, but at that point Pitt rallied with a 9-0 burst to trim the advantage to 64-61. Johnson scored seven of the points, and Wilson-Frame added a layup.

Pitt trailed at halftime for only the second time in nine games, 34-33, when Niagara’s James Towns hit a jumper with four seconds left. That ended a stretch of less than four minutes when Niagara outscored the Panthers, 10-2.

Turnovers and shooting accuracy that was not up to Pitt’s season average allowed Niagara to keep the score close. Pitt shot only 41.4 percent after coming into the game shooting 48.2. Ten turnovers — one every other minute — gave coach Jeff Capel plenty to discuss with his team in the locker room.

Pitt’s lead was never greater than seven points in the first half, but a few players had their moments.

Johnson hit two 3-pointers in a span of 58 seconds, and two slick passes by Sidy N’Dir set up backup center Terrell Brown for dunks on consecutive plays near the end of the half.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.