ShareThis Page
Riverhounds president Nightingale no longer with the team |

Riverhounds president Nightingale no longer with the team

Matt Grubba
| Monday, November 2, 2015 4:03 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Riverhounds' Rob Vincent (right( battles D.C. United's Miguel Aguilar for the ball on Wednesday, June, 17, 2015, at Highmark Stadium.

Riverhounds president Richard Nightingale is no longer with the club, team spokesperson Ian Thomson confirmed Monday to the Tribune-Review.

Majority owner Tuffy Shallenberger will be the acting president, but the club did not comment on Nightingale’s departure other than to say he had returned to Portland, Ore., where he and his wife have their home.

Nightingale could not be reached for comment.

Nightingale was hired by the Riverhounds in December and was involved in the hiring of coach Mark Steffens the same month. His last public act as team president was an open letter to fans posted on the team’s website a week after the team’s playoff loss Sept. 26 in New York. The letter detailed his outlook for the 2016 season, a season that now will come without Nightingale in the front office.

During his tenure, Nightingale oversaw improvements to the game-day experience at Highmark Stadium, which included a full renovation of the stadium’s dining and bar area, and secured an extension of the club’s sponsorship by Nike through the 2017 season.

Nightingale also worked behind the scenes to improve the once-fractured relationship between the Riverhounds and PA West, the state association governing soccer locally.

“Richard did a lot to reach out to us and improve things, and we hope to continue working together with the Riverhounds to improve soccer in Western Pennsylvania,” PA West president Randy Lowden said.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

Categories: Riverhounds
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.