Road-tested Matt Murray to start in goal for Penguins at Carolina |

Road-tested Matt Murray to start in goal for Penguins at Carolina

Jonathan Bombulie
The puck sails between Pittsburgh Penguins goaltender Matt Murray (30) and Pittsburgh Penguins defenseman Jack Johnson (73) as Johnson fights off Washington Capitals right wing Devante Smith-Pelly (25) in the third period of an NHL hockey game, Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2018, in Washington. The Penguins won 2-1.

RALEIGH, N.C. – Pittsburgh Penguins coach Mike Sullivan hasn’t started choosing his starting goalie based strictly on where the game is being played, but it’s not like the thought hasn’t crossed his mind.

Coming into Saturday night’s game at Carolina, Penguins goalies Matt Murray and Casey DeSmith both had extreme home-road splits this season.

Murray, who will start Saturday night, was great on the road (4-0-1, .937 save percentage) and terrible at home (2-5-0, .844).

DeSmith was great at home (8-2-2, .931) and OK on the road (3-4-2, .916).

A plan where Murray starts road games and DeSmith handles home games doesn’t seem that far-fetched.

A Franken-goalie playing under those circumstances would be 12-2-3 with a .933 save percentage this season. Considering Anaheim leads the league in team save percentage with a .919, that would win the Penguins quite a few games.

Still, Sullivan isn’t ready to take that plunge. Not yet anyway.

“At this point, not really,” he said. “Right now, we’ve played so much hockey over the last little while, we’re trying to utilize both guys. Both guys are playing extremely well for us. That’s really the main discussion that the coaching staff has. We are aware of the records.”

Follow the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.