ShareThis Page
Steelers defense dominates Bengals in second half of victory |

Steelers defense dominates Bengals in second half of victory

Maybe the Heinz Field crowd of 65,363 spontaneously broke into a chant of “De-fense, defense” early in the fourth quarter Sunday because it was still at a fever pitch after the requisite “Renegade” video was played moments earlier.

Perhaps it was the Tyson Alualu sack of Andy Dalton that immediately followed that got them fired up.

Or possibly it was that the Cincinnati Bengals offense seemed so out of sorts and shaken that it had just burned a valuable timeout in an apparent effort to regroup.

Most likely, though, the Steelers fans were chanting out of pure, organic appreciation of a defense that was dominating Sunday.

After a slow start over the Bengals’ first three drives, the Steelers shut down Cincinnati over the final 2 12 quarters of a 29-14 win.

“There was a lot of energy in the stadium today,” said Bud Dupree, who had one of the Steelers’ four sacks. “Everyone was making plays. Everyone was hungry. It was great. I like how we kind of had a little (hiccup) in the first half, but we came out in the second half and we answered the call. And the best is yet to come.”

It’s difficult to conceive anything yet to come from the Steelers’ defense that was better than how it performed over the Bengals’ final seven possessions Sunday.

After Cincinnati scored 14 points and accumulated 160 yards in their first three drives, it did virtually nothing the rest of the way.

Over their final seven possessions, the Bengals netted 20 yards on 23 snaps. They went three-and-out in five of those seven drives. Dalton was intercepted to end the other two.

After the 7-minute, 12-second mark of the second quarter, the Bengals managed one first down and a net of 2 passing yards. Among his final 17 dropbacks, Dalton had as many completions (six) as he had combined sacks (four) and interceptions (two).

“I think in order to be a defensive player, you always wanna dominate. That’s in our DNA,” said rookie T.J. Watt, whose sack early in the fourth quarter began s stretch of three sacks in a span of four Bengals snaps. “That’s why I love defense so much is you can make a play, no matter what down it is.”

Dupree completed the trifecta of sacks early in the fourth quarter, and it was Cameron Heyward who sacked Dalton to begin what would be their final meaningful drive with 5:14 remaining.

“They were behind the chains, so we could play with our hair on fire,” Heyward said. “When we don’t have to blitz (and) we can just run four-man rushes, that makes us a very sound defense.”

It’s making the Steelers’ one of the NFL’s best defenses.

“The goal is to be the best in the world,” safety Mike Mitchell said. “We’re not there yet.”

Technically, no. But they’re awfully close. The Steelers’ defense entered Sunday at No. 3 in the league by yardage. It emerged just a fraction of a yard behind No. 1 Denver.

“We are just starting to feel ourselves is all,” Dupree said. “We’re gonna keep getting better and better each week. That’s the crazy part.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker Bud Dupree sacks Bengals quarterback Andy Dalton in the fourth quarter Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017 at Heinz Field.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.