Steelers WR Martavis Bryant still unhappy: ‘I just want mines, period’ |

Steelers WR Martavis Bryant still unhappy: ‘I just want mines, period’

Joe Rutter

One week after denying he wants to be traded, Steelers wide receiver Martavis Bryant reportedly took to social media to express his displeasure with his role on the Steelers.

In a response to an Instagram post about rookie JuJu Smith-Schuster, a person using Bryant’s verified account wrote : “JuJu is no where near better than me, fool. All they need to do is give me what I want and y’all can have JuJu and whoever else.”

The post later was deleted and replaced with another that was complimentary of Smith-Schuster:

“JuJu is the future and got great talent and is going to be one of the best to play this game. I want him to get his. I just want mines, period, point-blank. Ain’t nobody did nothing to get me back. I worked my ass off to get myself back with no help and little support, period. In due time the process will show.”

Bryant was targeted just twice on quarterback Ben Roethlisberger’s 24 pass attempts in the Steelers’ 29-14 win Sunday over the Cincinnati Bengals. He had one catch for 3 yards. On the other target, a deep pass, Bryant lost track of the ball in flight, and it landed incomplete.

Bryant appeared to be frustrated after he was not targeted on an incompletion to Antonio Brown on a third-and-1 early in the fourth quarter. Bryant was seen shaking his head as he walked back to the sideline.

Smith-Schuster has cut into Bryant’s playing time and caught a 31-yard touchdown pass Sunday to give the Steelers a 14-7 lead.

Last Monday, Bryant denied an NFL Network report that said he had approached the Steelers and requested a trade.

In his first season back since serving a year-long suspension for violating the NFL’s substance-abuse policy, Bryant has 18 catches for 234 yards in seven games.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.