Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger makes no promises on passing to Martavis Bryant |

Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger makes no promises on passing to Martavis Bryant

Joe Rutter
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throws a pass during the first quarter against the Bengals Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, at Heinz Field.

Ben Roethlisberger wants to let disgruntled wide receiver Martavis Bryant to know he is a valuable member of the Steelers offense. He also wants Bryant to know there are no guarantees he will see more passes since he voiced his displeasure on social media.

Simply put, Roethlisberger isn't making promises he can't keep.

“I'm not going to be a doctor and promise I'm going to save your life,” Roethlisberger said Wednesday morning. “I'm going to tell him if you're on your details and we're working together and I trust that you're going to be where we're supposed to be and you're there, good things will happen.”

Good things rarely have happened for Bryant this season, his first back with the Steelers since serving a year-long suspension for violating the NFL's substance abuse policy. Through seven games, Bryant has just 18 catches for 234 yards – a 13.0 average that is four yard less than what he averaged in his first two NFL seasons.

Roethlisberger said Tuesday that he plans to sit down and talk to Bryant about ways they can get him more involved in the offense. As of Wednesday morning, that meeting hadn't happened, Roethlisberger said.

“I'm the guy that throws the ball, so if you're unhappy about something, come talk to me,” he said. “Maybe there is something we can figure out together to make it better.”

Roethlisberger said Bryant's recent comments on Instagram – he said “I want mine” and downplayed rookie JuJu Smith-Schuster's ability – came as a surprise because he said the 25-year-old receiver has been a model teammate in the locker room and on the field.

“You never hear him complain,” Roethlisberger said. “I never hear him on the field – crying, complaining, wanting the ball, throwing his hands up, not running hard, doing things like that.

“You see him blocking hard after guys catch the ball during runs. I grab him on the sideline and talk about the (images of plays) like I do with other guys, and he's very engaging.”

Three years ago, the Steelers cut running back LeGarrette Blount when he walked off the field in anger before the conclusion of a game in Tennessee. Roethlisberger doesn't think Bryant's situation is comparable.

“Martavis is out there busting his butt,” he said. “You hear frustrations when he goes home and gets on social media. Here in the locker room, we don't see any of that. That's why potentially it is treated a little differently.”

Roethlisberger was asked if the Bryant controversy can be solved with one long touchdown pass to the 6-foot-4 deep threat. Bryant, after all, has just one touchdown reception this year after scoring 14 times in his first two seasons.

“Hopefully, it's lots of touchdown passes,” Roethlisberger said. “We need to get the ball to him, to everybody, we all need to score points. There are opportunities there. That's why I told him to come talk to me.

“We've had opportunities with deep balls that were just missed whether it was me overthrowing him or it's the Chicago game where he slows down a little bit or this last game where he doesn't see the ball coming out of my hand.

“There are plays to be had. We just have to make them.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.