ShareThis Page
With 6 sacks Sunday, Steelers set season sack record of 56 |

With 6 sacks Sunday, Steelers set season sack record of 56

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Tyson Alualu sacks Browns quarterback DeShone Kizer during the fourth quarter Sunday, Dec. 31, 2017, at Heinz Field.

Some mild franchise history within grasp and playing a game that in all likelihood had no bearing on their postseason seeding, the Steelers’ passrushers picked their priority.

“We stopped playing the defense a couple times to make some plays to try to get the sack,” linebacker Bud Dupree said with a wide smile.

“I feel like that’s why we gave up so many yards; we were focused on that sack record.”

When Tyson Alualu swung down DeShone Kizer for a seven-yard loss on the fourth play of the fourth quarter Sunday, the Steelers had their 56th sack of the season, passing the 1994 and 2001 teams that had 55 each for the most in a season in team history.

“It means a lot, to go amongst the greats,” Dupree said. “You got ‘Peezy’ (former outside linebacker and current outside linebackers coach Joey Porter) and ‘Deebo’ (former outside linebacker James Harrison) and (former outside linebacker Lamarr) Woodley and all those guys.”

Making his fourth start of the season, Alualu had a pair of sacks in the 28-24 victory against the Cleveland Browns. T.J. Watt, Vince Williams, Sean Davis and L.J. Fort also had sacks of Kizer.

“I just think a lot of the guys are growing and maturing as players and within the scheme that we are employing,” coach Mike Tomlin said of the sack record. “I think that comfort and familiarity probably produced the improvements.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.