ShareThis Page
Report: Steelers to use franchise tag on Le’Veon Bell again |

Report: Steelers to use franchise tag on Le’Veon Bell again

With the NFL Combine in the rear-view mirror after final workouts Monday, the Steelers will jump headfirst into perhaps their most important offseason business as they face a 4 p.m. deadline Tuesday to use the franchise tag on running back Le’Veon Bell for a second consecutive season.

The NFL Network reported Monday the Steelers are expected to tag Bell but will continue negotiations until the deadline. Bell told ESPN the Steelers will tag him barring a last-minute agreement, which he viewed as unlikely.

“We’re not coming to a number we both agree on — they are too low, or I guess they feel I’m too high,” Bell told ESPN. “I’m playing for strictly my value to the team. That’s what I’m asking. I don’t think I should settle for anything less than what I’m valued at.”

General manager Kevin Colbert said the Steelers were hoping not to use the franchise tag and sign Bell to a long-term contract. Colbert also said he was prepared to use the tag, if necessary, because it is an option under the collective bargaining agreement.

“We are going to continue to have negotiations with Le’Veon and (agent) Adisa Bakari,” Colbert said last week in Indianapolis on the eve of the NFL Combine. “Try to figure out common ground for a long-term deal. I think that is not only our goal, but their goal as well.”

The franchise tag will set Bell’s salary for next season at $14.54 million. It can be used as a placeholder until July 16 for the two sides to continue working out terms of a long-term deal. Last year, after Bell was franchised at $12.12 million, the two sides failed to negotiate a contract, and it gave the All-Pro running back leverage to skip training camp. Bell did not sign his franchise tender until the week before the regular season, and it’s a process the Steelers do not wish to repeat again.

Bell was not happy he played under the tag last season. He told ESPN on Monday that he wasn’t bluffing in January when he said he would consider sitting out the season if he is tagged again.

“I just have to decide if I’m going to play when the time comes,” Bell told ESPN.

If the Steelers use the franchise tag on Bell and he does not sign it, the franchise also has the option of rescinding it, which would make Bell a free agent. For example: The Steelers see no progress on a long-term deal with Bell by, say, the NFL Draft. The Steelers could rescind Bell’s offer and select a running back in the draft to replace him. Bell would enter free agency but at an undesirable time of the calendar. It is the risk a player faces when he does not sign his franchise tender.

The Steelers used the exclusive franchise tag on Bell last year, which meant no other teams could negotiate with him. Under the non-exclusive tag, teams could negotiate with Bell. The Steelers would have the right to match any offer or receive two first-round draft picks in return.

“We’ll see where that goes, but we haven’t really talked too much about that,” Colbert said last week. “What we are focused on is let’s get a long-term deal done.”

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' David DeCastro and Vance McDonald block for running back LeVeon Bell against the Chiefs in the second quarter Sunday, Oct. 15, 2017 at Arrowhead Stadium.
Pittsburgh Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert speaks during a press conference at the NFL football scouting combine in Indianapolis, Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2018.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.