Steelers training camp preview: FB Roosevelt Nix could see increased role |

Steelers training camp preview: FB Roosevelt Nix could see increased role

Joe Rutter
Pittsburgh Steelers fullback Roosevelt Nix-Jones (45) runs onto the field during pregame of an NFL football game against the Detroit Lions, Sunday, Oct. 29 2017, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Duane Burleson)

The Tribune-Review will examine each position on the Steelers roster as they prepare to report for training camp July 25 at Saint Vincent. Today’s installment looks at the two fullbacks:


Roosevelt Nix: The Steelers thought enough of Nix’s blocking skills that they signed him to a four-year contract in February. That’s how much they value a player who was on the field for a career-high 16.4 percent of the offensive snaps last year yet contributed his first career rushing and receiving touchdowns.

Draft pick

Jaylen Samuels: The fifth-round draft pick is more of an H-back than a traditional fullback, but he did it all at N.C. State.

His pass-catching skills — Samuels is a converted tight end — make him valuable on third down.

Camp question

Will Nix become a bigger part of the offense?

Offensive coordinator Todd Haley made some confounding decisions by often keeping Nix on the sidelines in obvious running situations. With Randy Fichtner in charge, it will be worth watching to see if Nix is used more frequently as a blocker.

Next: Wide receivers

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.