Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey sounds off on Le’Veon Bell |

Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey sounds off on Le’Veon Bell

Tim Benz

When it comes to the Steelers, the only thing more reliable than a Chris Boswell field goal is a Maurkice Pouncey quote when something goes wrong in the locker room.

Last year, the Steelers center sounded off about James Harrison forcing himself off the roster. Now, Pouncey is taking the lead when it comes to calling out Le’Veon Bell for his absence because of his contract dispute.

“Honestly, it’s a little selfish,” Pouncey said after practice Wednesday. “I’m kind of (ticked) right now. It (stinks) that he’s not here. We’ll move on as a team. It doesn’t look like he’ll be in the game plan at this point (for Sunday against Cleveland). (James) Conner looks great. We’ll worry about (Bell) in Week 2.”

Pouncey was then asked if he thought it was likely Bell will miss all 10 games between now and when he needed to report to qualify for an accrued year before free agency.

“At this point, go ahead and miss 10,” Pouncey said.

Pouncey wasn’t done, suggesting the Steelers running back, who is staying away from signing a $14.55 million franchise tag, was putting himself before the team.

“Obviously, it’s Le’Veon over the Steelers. We are the Steelers. At this point, it’s bigger than business. Now that it’s game time and you have $14 million looming out there and your team really wants you here, at this point we have Conner.”

As for Conner, Bell’s primary backup at running back, Pouncey said, “A star is born every year. Maybe the stars will align for him this year.”

Pouncey then went on to heap praise on Conner for his improvement and development in his second year. It is expected Conner will make his debut as a starter Sunday against the Browns.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers center Maurkice Pouncey plays against the Vikings Sept. 2017 at Heinz Field.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.