Steelers injury report: Morgan Burnett (groin) downgraded at practice |

Steelers injury report: Morgan Burnett (groin) downgraded at practice

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Morgan Burnett leaps over Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes after a run Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018 at Heinz Field.

Safety Morgan Burnett did not practice Friday, hurting his chances of playing in the Pittsburgh Steelers’ game Monday night at Tampa Bay.

A nine-year veteran signed in the offseason, Burnett was bothered by a hamstring injury throughout much of the preseason and training camp. He did not start the regular-season opener as a result but played extensively. Last week, Burnett played 52 of the Steelers’ 58 defensive snaps during the loss to the Chiefs and said he was fully healthy.

Burnett was limited during Thursday’s practice.

Rookie first-round pick Terrell Edmunds has played strong safety in Burnett’s place throughout the preseason and in the opener at Cleveland. Burnett, though, has played in other roles during subpackages.

Also missing practice Friday were two starters on the offensive line: guard David DeCastro (hand fracture) and tackle Marcus Gilbert (hamstring), as well as defensive lineman Stephon Tuitt (illness).

Cornerback Joe Haden, guard Ramon Foster and defensive lineman Tyson Alualu each went through a full practice and have few worries he can play Monday.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.