Le’Veon Bell removes association with Steelers on social media accounts |

Le’Veon Bell removes association with Steelers on social media accounts

Joe Rutter

Le’Veon Bell is disassociating himself from the Pittsburgh Steelers on his social media accounts.

Is that a sign he plans to sit out the rest of the season before testing free agency in 2019?

Bell has removed any references to the Steelers in his Twitter and Instagram bios, identifying himself instead as an “All Pro NFL Running back.” As recently as Nov. 4, he continued to label himself as “Running Back, Pittsburgh Steelers.”

Bell has until Tuesday at 4 p.m. to report to the team and sign his franchise-tag tender. Once that deadline passes, he cannot play this season — for the Steelers or any other team, per NFL rules. Bell already has forfeited $7.7 million of his $14.544 million franchise-tag tender by staying away from the team for the first nine weeks of the NFL season.

Steelers president Art Rooney II told SiriusXM NFL Radio on Thursday night that he expect Bell to play for the Steelers this season.

“I don’t know what his plans are, but I would say that at this point we would expect him to come back next week,” Rooney II said. “We know he’s back in Pittsburgh. We’re hoping to have some communication with him over the weekend.”

Bell created a stir on social media in late February when he changed his Twitter profile photo from one of him wearing a Steelers uniform to a photo of Bell wearing a red hoodie. He also changed his handle from @L_Bell26 to @LeVeonBell.

Then, on Wednesday night, Bell wrote a series of tweets that were posted upside down.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.