ShareThis Page
Kevin Gorman: These Steelers stink, showing ignorance with arrogance |

Kevin Gorman: These Steelers stink, showing ignorance with arrogance

| Monday, December 10, 2018 12:09 p.m
Ben Margot/AP
Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (left) talks with head coach Mike Tomlin during the first half of the game against the Oakland Raiders in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Dec. 9, 2018.
Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin during the second half of an NFL football game against the Oakland Raiders in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Dec. 9, 2018. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)


To play for a team where the Super Bowl is the standard requires a level of confidence bordering arrogance, and that’s about the only department where your Pittsburgh Steelers have no shortcomings.

The Steelers talk about qualifying for the playoffs as if it’s a sure thing, as if the season only serves to set their seeding. They talk about their 7-5-1 record as if it’s an accomplishment, never mind that they have beaten only one team (the Baltimore Ravens) with a winning record.

The Steelers stink.

That’s the sad truth, even if their 24-21 loss to the Oakland Raiders didn’t affect their playoff standing. They still have a half-game lead over the Ravens in the AFC North, still are positioned for the fourth seed in the conference because the Patriots, Texans and Ravens all lost. The uneven AFC could be the Steelers’ salvation.

That the Steelers lost to a team in full-blown rebuild after trading Khalil Mack and Amari Cooper for draft picks should have served notice that they stink. But the Steelers sounded as stunned about the outcome as anyone, and their reaction to losing to a two-win team this late in the season was a sign that they don’t recognize their own arrogance.

“Redemption Sunday is coming,” Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said, “and we’d better be prepared for it as it is every Sunday.”

The Steelers showed few redeeming qualities Sunday at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum that would give you the impression that they can beat the New England Patriots or New Orleans Saints in the next two weeks, let alone the Cincinnati Bengals in what could be a do-or-die season finale.

“It’s getting down to the nitty-gritty,” Steelers defensive end Cameron Heyward said. “If we want to be in the playoffs, we’ve got to win these three (darn) games, simple as that.”

It can be argued that arrogance simply cost the Steelers this game. They arrogantly believed they could thrive this season without Le’Veon Bell, one of the best running backs in the NFL, and were ill-prepared to deal with an injury to James Conner. They arrogantly believed they could overcome Conner’s sprained ankle and beat the Raiders with an unproven rookie in Jaylen Samuels and an ineffective Stevan Ridley, who combined for 32 rushing yards on 16 carries.

The Steelers arrogantly believed they could beat the Raiders without Ben Roethlisberger in the second half, the only logical explanation for Tomlin leaving Josh Dobbs in the game after Big Ben returned to the sidelines from a rib injury and stood idle for two series.

The Steelers arrogantly believed they could stop Derek Carr, even as he completed 25 of 34 passes for 322 yards and two touchdowns without an interception, even after Mike Hilton and Sean Davis proved that the Steelers can’t even pick off passes that hit them in the hands.

The Steelers arrogantly believed they could win another close game, despite the tie at Cleveland and the five-point loss to the Kansas City Chiefs and the seven-point loss at Denver and the three-point loss to the Los Angeles Chargers. They arrogantly believed they could tie the score with a field goal, even as Chris Boswell missed a 39-yard field goal and nearly botched a PAT.

That Boswell slipped and fell on what should have been a chip shot was symbolic of the Steelers this season. They couldn’t capitalize against a bad team as they were outgained by the Raiders (354-340) even though Oakland was penalized 13 times for 130 yards.

“We’re going to continue to work,” Tomlin said. “We’re going to absorb the negativity that comes with our current position. We understand that we created it. It’s our job to fix it.”

That’s part of the problem, too. The Steelers arrogantly believe that their repeated shortcomings are the result of correctable mistakes instead of, as All-Pro right guard David DeCastro said, sleepwalking.

The Steelers haven’t beaten any true Super Bowl contenders this season, and they haven’t beaten many teams with wins against anyone of consequence: The Tampa Bay Buccaneers (5-8) beat New Orleans, and the Jacksonville Jaguars (4-9) beat New England.

Even so, the Steelers arrogantly believe that they are the same team that won five games by three points or less last season instead of the team that lost in overtime at Chicago and at home against New England and twice to Jacksonville, including a playoff game at Heinz Field.

“It’s hard to tell, man,” Hilton said. “We’ve got a lot of the same guys. We’ve just got to find ways to finish games. Once we do that, who knows how things can turn out?”

Oh, everybody paying close attention already knows.

That the Steelers are showing ignorance to their arrogance is their greatest shortcoming in a season of them. This is a team that believes redemption is coming but doesn’t appear prepared, looking less like a playoff team and more like a bottom feeder that continues to come up short in games that had no business being so close.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.