ShareThis Page
Steelers kicker Chris Boswell deletes his Twitter account |

Steelers kicker Chris Boswell deletes his Twitter account

Chris Pastrick
| Monday, December 17, 2018 3:03 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers kicker Chris Boswell celebrates his fourth quarter field goal with holder Jordan Berry during a game against the Patriots Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018, at Heinz Field.
Don Wright/AP
Pittsburgh Steelers kicker Chris Boswell misses a field goal attempt during the second half of the game against the New England Patriots in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Dec. 16, 2018.

Pittsburgh Steelers kicker Chris Boswell deleted his Twitter account following the team’s 17-10 victory of the New England Patriots, according to various media outlets.

It’s unclear why he deleted his account, although it likely could have been due to the volume of negative comments from fans.

Already having missed 11 kicks this season, Boswell missed a 32-yarder Sunday.

ItzYinzburgh posted screenshots showing more than a few fans tweeting “kill yourself” at the 27-year-old kicker.

In addition to deleting his Twitter, Boswell disabled comments on his Instagram.

As for Sunday’s game, Boswell redeemed himself somewhat, making a 48-yard field goal late in the game.

Earlier this week, the Steelers brought in two other kickers for tryouts, but opted to stick with Boswell. Former teammate Shaun Suisham was brought in as a guest at practice to help.

Back in August, the Steelers signed the Boswell to a multi-year deal reportedly worth slightly less than $20 million. It will keep him with the Steelers through the 2022 season.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at 724-226-4697, or via Twitter @CPastrickTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.