ShareThis Page
James Conner among 6 Steelers players selected for Pro Bowl |

James Conner among 6 Steelers players selected for Pro Bowl

Joe Rutter
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:24 p.m
Pittsburgh Steelers running back James Conner (30) runs against the Los Angeles Chargers in the first quarter of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 2, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Don Wright)Running back James Conner was among the Steelers’ six Pro Bowl selections.

James Conner’s emergence in his first season as a starting running back did not go unnoticed by his NFL peers.

Conner, the second-year running back from Pitt who was tasked with replacing Le’Veon Bell this season, was selected to the Pro Bowl on Tuesday night. He was one of six Pittsburgh Steelers players selected to play in the postseason all-star game, which will be held Jan. 27, in Orlando, Fla.

Also selected were wide receiver Antonio Brown, center Maurkice Pouncey, left tackle Alejandro Villanueva, right guard David DeCastro and defensive tackle Cameron Heyward.

With seven players, the Los Angeles Chargers were the only team with more Pro Bowl players selected than the Steelers.

Conner leads the Steelers and is 10 th in the NFL with 909 yards rushing despite missing the past two games because of an ankle injury. Conner’s 12 rushing touchdowns are tied for second among all running backs.

The other Steelers’ first-time selection is Heyward, who was picked as an injury replacement last season when he also was named to the All-Pro team. Heyward has 46 tackles and six sacks this season.

Brown, who leads the NFL with 13 touchdown receptions, was selected for the seventh time in his career and sixth in a row. DeCastro was picked for the fourth consecutive season, Pouncey for the third year in a row (and seventh time overall), and Villanueva was recognized for the second year in a row.

Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, who ranks second in the NFL with 4,462 passing yards, was not one of the three AFC quarterbacks selected to the team. The AFC quarterbacks will be Tom Brady, Philip Rivers and Patrick Mahomes. Also snubbed was wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster, who had 95 receptions for 1,274 yards in his second NFL season.

When fan balloting, which comprises one-third of the selection process, concluded last week, the Steelers had the top vote getters at eight positions. Conner, Brown, Villanueva, DeCastro and Pouncey led their respective positions as did inside linebacker Vince Williams and special teams player Roosevelt Nix.

Last season, the Steelers had eight players picked for the Pro Bowl, the most among NFL teams and their highest allotment since 2005 when they had nine players selected.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.