ShareThis Page
Antonio Brown joins Sean Davis, Vince Williams as Steelers who miss practice |

Antonio Brown joins Sean Davis, Vince Williams as Steelers who miss practice

Chris Adamski
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) carries ahead of New Orleans Saints defensive end Marcus Davenport (92) in the second half of an NFL football game in New Orleans, Sunday, Dec. 23, 2018. (AP Photo/Butch Dill)

It’s not atypical these days for veteran receiver Antonio Brown to miss a practice. It raises eyebrows, though, when the All Pro Pittsburgh Steelers receiver misses consecutive practices.

According to the team’s official injury report, Brown did not participate Thursday. Unlike his absence Wednesday, which was classified as “coaches decision,” Thursday’s injury added “knee” under the category of injury. Brown is one of a handful of veterans who usually sit out either the Wednesday or Thursday weekly practice.

Brown has missed only two regular-season games because of injury over the past six years. He had the best statistical game of his season during Sunday’s loss at New Orleans (14 catches, 185 yards, two touchdowns).

Coach Mike Tomlin did not disclose an injury to Brown either after Sunday’s game nor during his weekly news conference Tuesday.

The Steelers have a must-win regular-season finale Sunday at Heinz Field if they have a chance of qualifying for the postseason.

The Steelers perhaps will be without two other starters for the game against the Cincinnati Bengals: safety Sean Davis (quad) and linebacker Vince Williams (toe) sat out practice for the second consecutive day.

Running back James Conner, though, practiced for the second day in a row. He is hoping to play for the first time in four weeks since suffering an ankle injury.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.