Back on the field, Steelers’ Bell discusses Burfict, knee injury |

Back on the field, Steelers’ Bell discusses Burfict, knee injury

Chris Adamski
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell handles the ball during the first day of organized team activites Tuesday, May 24, 2016, on South Side.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell handles the ball during the first day of organized team activites Tuesday, May 24, 2016, on the South Side.

Le’Veon Bell was beaming Tuesday because he took part in a practice-like setting with Steelers teammates for the first time since October.

Afterward, however, his mood turned when talking about the hit he absorbed from Cincinnati Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict that tore Bell’s right MCL on Nov. 1 at Heinz Field and ended Bell’s season.

Bell, an All-Pro running back, said he didn’t think it was an accident.

“I take the (point of view) that everyone just plays football just to love the game,” Bell said, “but there are people out here who are not playing like that: People out here trying to really take people out, so obviously I know that now.

“I wish I wasn’t ignorant to the fact of it before, but now I just know I have to take extra precautions of, you know, getting down (instead of fighting through a tackle) or protecting myself because people are (out to) take me out of the game.”

A Bengals player has ended Bell’s season each of the past two years. Safety Reggie Nelson tackled him low during the 2014 regular-season finale, hyperextending Bell’s right knee.

Bell said he believes those hits indicate two things:

One, he is not injury-prone: “I never was injured in football (before getting to the NFL),” he said.

Two, many players are playing with an intent to injure.

“I feel like a lot of teams will feel like it’s easier to take me out or (fellow stars Antonio Brown or Ben Roethlisberger), whatever, so we obviously have to be precautious,” Bell said after he took part in all individual drills but none of the 11-on-11 sessions during the Steelers’ first organized team activities session. “I didn’t think people played football like that, but it’s real.”

Bell was careful to not necessarily single out the Bengals — with whom the Steelers have a simmering rivalry — or Burfict, who also injured Brown and Roethlisberger with hits last season. On multiple occasions he implied other teams target players, too.

Still, Bell said of the Nov. 1 game, “I don’t think it was just (Burfict). It was like the whole team was really out there trying to like twist my ankles and do little, dirty stuff in between the piles.”

Bell was heading out of bounds when Burfict hit him. Burfict immediately ran in a celebratory manner, angering the Steelers. Bell acknowledged the social media well-wishes Burfict sent after Bell was cleared to run this spring.

Bell said he will be cleared to participate in contact drills by training camp and that “I’ll be 100 percent” in time for the season opener Sept. 12 at Washington.

“They take me through a nice little process and were holding me back from myself,” Bell said. “So even though I felt like I was ready to do all the cuts and stuff, and I felt like I was strong enough, doctors were like, ‘No, don’t do this yet. Don’t do that yet.’ I always want to listen to the professionals. And plus we’ve got a long offseason. We have a long time until we actually have got to (play a meaningful game).”

Entering the final season of his contract, Bell said there hadn’t been discussions between him or his agent and the Steelers about an extension.

Bell said realizing some players are out to injure others has changed how he approaches the game.

“I’m still going to be physical. I just know that when I’m on the sidelines, I can’t expect somebody to just push me out of bounds, you know?” Bell said. “I can’t take nothing for granted.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.