Bell was ‘managing’ groin injury before AFC title game |

Bell was ‘managing’ groin injury before AFC title game

Chris Adamski
Pittsburgh Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell watches from the sideline as he waits for the end of the AFC championship NFL football game against the New England Patriots, Sunday, Jan. 22, 2017, in Foxborough, Mass. The Patriots won 36-17 to advance to the Super Bowl. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin acknowledged Le’Veon Bell had a groin injury before Sunday’s AFC championship game. Tomlin doesn’t think that admission will get the Steelers in trouble with the league office.

Bell, the Steelers 2016 MVP, played 11 snaps in the loss at New England because of an injury to his left groin he said had been lingering for several weeks.

“He was doing a great job of managing it,” Tomlin said. “It didn’t cause him to miss any practice time, let alone game time. It was just something to manage.”

Bell missed three of the Steelers’ six full practices over the past two weeks, but the Wednesdays missed were labeled by the team as “not injury related” (This past Thursday, Bell was away from the team on a personal issue.)

Last week, ESPN reported the Seahawks could be docked a second-round pick because of their season-long failure to report a knee injury to Richard Sherman. Two days after the season ended, Seattle coach Pete Carroll said the cornerback played with a “significant” MCL injury. A Sherman knee injury was not reported by the team, as is required by NFL rules.

Tomlin said Tuesday it was “my understanding” Bell’s injury did not need to be listed by the Steelers.

“Just about everybody in that locker room has things they’re managing in an effort to stay on the field,” Tomlin said. “To my estimation, he was managing it extremely well. It didn’t cause him to miss any practice reps, so I didn’t list it.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.