Blocked field goal nothing new for Broncos’ Justin Simmons |

Blocked field goal nothing new for Broncos’ Justin Simmons

Joe Rutter
Denver Broncos free safety Justin Simmons (31) tackles Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Ryan Switzer (10) during the first half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Nov. 25, 2018, in Denver. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey)

DENVER — Denver Broncos safety Justin Simmons has a history of blocking kicks, so it wasn’t surprising to see him do it in the first quarter Sunday when he got a hand on Chris Boswell’s 48-yard field-goal attempt.

It was the second block of the season for Simmons, who also did it against the Baltimore Ravens’ Justin Tucker in Week 3.

Simmons leaped between long snapper Kam Canaday and guard B.J. Finney to block the kick. He used the same move to block Tucker’s kick.

Simmons also chipped in with eight tackles to help the Broncos defeat the Steelers, 24-17, at Mile High Stadium.

In addition to the blocked field goal, the Broncos forced four turnovers, including two in the end zone.

“That’s five plays that we made that couldn’t been scoring plays,” Broncos coach Vance Joseph said. “That was huge for us.”

In 2016, Simmons blocked an extra point that was returned for a two-point score that gave the Broncos a win over the New Orleans Saints. That offseason, in a move influenced by Simmons’ block, the NFL outlawed players leaping over the line of scrimmage from a running start.

Defensive players might be within a yard of the line of scrimmage on extra-point and field-goal attempts.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.