Four Downs: Steelers, Ben Roethlisberger eschewing use of play-action fake |

Four Downs: Steelers, Ben Roethlisberger eschewing use of play-action fake

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) runs toward the goal line where he will score a go-ahead touchdown with 5 seconds left in an NFL football game against the Jacksonville Jaguars, Sunday, Nov. 18, 2018, in Jacksonville, Fla. (AP Photo/Gary McCullough)

1. No action

With one of the NFL’s leading rushers at their disposal, one would imagine that the Pittsburgh Steelers utilize plenty of play-action fakes. Not so. According to Pro Football Focus, no quarterback in the league who has started at least two games has used the play action less often than Ben Roethlisberger at 10.5 percent. And he’s lowest by a long shot, too – the second-lowest usage of play action among quarterbacks who have started at least five games this season used it at a rate of almost 50 percent more often (Matthew Stafford, 15.3 percent).

For perspective, check out the (much-higher) percentages of play-action usage by some of these big-name quarterbacks: Jared Goff (37.4 percent), Patrick Mahomes (29.9 percent), Carson Wentz (29.2 percent), Cam Newton (28.2 percent), Tom Brady (27.1 percent) and Matt Ryan (26.6 percent).

Why are the Steelers eschewing the play action? Maybe because Roethlisberger is one of only six among the 34 qualifying quarterbacks whose yards per attempt is worse after a play-action fake than when there’s no fake. Roethlisberger’s passer rating also is better without the play action (97.1) than with (94.9).

2. Quite the protection

Then again, why bother with the fake if the passrushers aren’t getting to Big Ben anyway? By any measure, Steelers have an elite passblocking offensive line: only two teams have allowed fewer sacks (14), PFF rates them as the NFL’s best at pass blocking efficiency (90.6) and ranks them second at adjusted sack rate (4.1 percent).

But how about what the Colts are doing and how their offensive line is protecting franchise quarterback Andrew Luck? The Colts have not allowed a sack in any of their past five games; if the line avoids a sack Sunday against the Dolphins, the Colts will become the fourth team since 1963 to have a six-game sackless streak in a season.

3. Not in much of a rush

Often when the passrushing production (or, sometimes, lack thereof) of Bud Dupree or T.J. Watt is broached, it’s quickly pointed out by Steelers personnel that Dupree and Watt are increasingly tasked with going out in pass coverage in lieu of rushing the quarterback. Most Steelers outside linebackers over the past 2 ½ decades (since the 3-4 “Blitzburgh” era began) had one task: to paraphrase Bill Cowher to Greg Lloyd in an iconic NFL Films moment, “Rush. The. Quarterback.”

Today’s Steelers outside linebackers, though, are covering running backs or tight ends a lot more often. According to Pro Football Focus, among the top 60 “edge rushers” in the NFL, Watt (23.4 percent of passing snaps played) and Bud Dupree (16.7 percent) are in coverage the fourth- and eighth-most.

The numbers incidentailly say that Dupree has been significantly better, be it measured by opponents’ passer rating (68.1 vs. 104.6), yards allowed per coverage snap (1.00 vs. 2.06) or snaps per opponent reception (11.8 vs. 5.6).

4. Working fast

Are the Steelers one of the most up-tempo teams in the NFL? In the first half, at least, yes – and it’s during the first half in which pace of play can be best measured. According to Football Outsiders, the Steelers during the first half of games this season run a play on average of every 26.30 seconds. That’s third-fastest in the NFL behind New England and Baltimore.

In the second half, interestingly, the Steelers are the sixth- slowest team in terms of seconds per snap. But second-half pace-of-play is dependent on game situation (i.e., it’s to the advantage of a team with a big lead to play it slow and a team that is trailing will move quickly).

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.