ShareThis Page
Getting to know: Steelers punter Will Monday |

Getting to know: Steelers punter Will Monday

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers punter Will Monday during practice Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2016 at St. Vincent College in Latrobe.

Will Monday

Position: Punter Height/weight: 6-foot-4, 210 lbs.

Experience: Rookie

College: Duke

No player has held the job as Steelers punter for two consecutive full seasons in the Mike Tomlin era — and Monday is out to extend that streak by unseating incumbent Jordan Berry. Berry, in turn, is hoping to win a camp battle for the second consecutive season after taking the job away from 2014 Steelers punter Brad Wing. Monday led the ACC in gross punting average as a freshman and was Duke’s punter for four years. He was considered one of the top rookie punters available for this year’s draft but was not one of the three who were selected.

Were you always a punter growing up?

I didn’t start playing football until ninth grade; when I did, it was just kicking field goals and punting, so I just kind of stuck with it. I figured out it worked for me, and I enjoyed it and kept getting better at it. It’s brought me a long way; I’m a small-town player — so I couldn’t be happier with it.

What’s it been like punting for an NFL team — even if it’s just practice?

It’s pretty exciting. It’s something I’ve worked really hard for, so I’m happy to be here. It’s really awesome.

You’ve obviously been blessed with athletic aptitude to do what you do at a high level, but how much can and do you practice punting?

Golf swings and kicking or punting, it’s very similar. It’s kind of all the same way. There are little things that you can change that can make huge improvements.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.