Haley: Ben ‘as good as anybody I’ve ever seen’ |

Haley: Ben ‘as good as anybody I’ve ever seen’

His offensive coordinator and primary receiver know just how good Ben Roethlisberger was during his 522-yard game against the Indianapolis Colts.

“He was on his game as good as anybody I’ve ever seen anybody be on their game at that position,” Steelers offensive coordinator Todd Haley said. “The offensive line, the receivers, the tight ends and running backs, everybody played at a high level and executed. … We have the type of group that, when we do that, when we go out and execute like that, we will have good results.”

Receiver Antonio Brown said of Roethlisberger’s 40-of-49 day: “When he’s in that zone, it’s absolutely special.”

‘Always brutal’

Brown said Baltimore Ravens games are like no other on the schedule.

“It’s always brutal,” he said. “You have to put the extra pads in, and you have to protect yourself at all times. It’s just that type of game.”

The Steelers are 4-5 against the Ravens since Brown was drafted in 2010, counting a 2010 playoff win.

Containing Suggs

No player has more sacks of Roethlisberger than Terrell Suggs, who has 16 12 counting the postseason.

“He’s one of the best that plays the game, and that’s rushing the passer and getting after it,” Roethlisberger said. “(He has) a high motor. (I have) a lot of respect for him, and we’ll just try to keep him off me.”

Roethlisberger hasn’t been sacked in the six quarters since Mike Adams began filling in for Marcus Gilbert (concussion) at right tackle. But Gilbert is expected to return and start Sunday night.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.