ShareThis Page
Le’Veon Bell penalized for punching goal posts after TD |

Le’Veon Bell penalized for punching goal posts after TD

| Sunday, October 15, 2017 11:36 p.m
Getty Images
Running back Le'Veon Bell of the Pittsburgh Steelers boxes the goal post after scoring a touchdown during the second quarter of the game against the Kansas City Chiefs at Arrowhead Stadium on Oct. 15, 2017 in Kansas City.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Le’Veon Bell received an excessive celebration penalty following his 3-yard touchdown run on the first play of the second quarter. Bell celebrated by taking some sparring jabs at the goal post. Under the NFL’s relaxed celebration rules this season, players can use the football as a prop — but not goal posts. …

Coach Mike Tomlin lost a challenge at 8:51 of the second quarter after a Chiefs punt was downed at the 1-yard-line. Tomlin thought Akeen Hunt’s toe was on the goal line when he batted the ball back onto the field. Replay officials agreed with the ruling on the field, and the Steelers took over at the 1. They drove 93 yards in 12 plays before Chris Boswell kicked a 24-yard field goal. … With 155 yards receiving, Antonio Brown has 9,077 for his career. He surpassed 9,000 receiving yards in his 107th career game, tying Randy Moss for the fourth-fewest games needed to reach that milestone.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.