Mason Rudolph opens camp as Steelers’ No. 4 QB — and struggles |

Mason Rudolph opens camp as Steelers’ No. 4 QB — and struggles

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review

Hold off on the succession plan for Ben Roethlisberger. Don’t anoint Mason Rudolph just yet.

In a not entirely-unexpected development, Rudolph didn’t open training camp as the Steelers’ No. 2 quarterback – and the hyped third-round pick wasn’t even third-string either.

Rudolph’s reps at his first NFL camp practice came after those of Roethlisberger, veteran backup Landry Jones and last year’s fourth-round pick, Josh Dobbs. Rudolph didn’t even get a practice rep until at least the third drill of the practice at Saint Vincent.

And when Rudolph did get one, it didn’t go well. During that first drill, an attempted pass looked like something out of a blooper reel and landed harmlessly behind him after he tried to release it while rolling out to the right.

Late in practice, Rudolph also misfired badly on a short throw to an open Pharoah McKever over the middle.

It wasn’t all bad for Rudolph, though; he did have completions. And it was only one practice; Rudolph was largely receiving rave reviews for his work as a rookie at organized team activities and mini-camp this spring.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.