Matt Feiler returns as Steelers 1st-team right tackle, Chuks Okorafor reverts to former role |

Matt Feiler returns as Steelers 1st-team right tackle, Chuks Okorafor reverts to former role

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers offensive lineman Matt Feiler during practice Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2018 at Memorial Stadium in Latrobe.

The Pittsburgh Steelers’ situation going forward at right tackle began to settle itself out Wednesday.

Matt Feiler took reps with the first-team offense, Chuks Okorafor confirmed afterward. Feiler had started four consecutive games at right tackle but did not play during this past Sunday’s loss at Denver following a pec injury suffered the week before in a win at Jacksonville.

“No, no first-team,” Okorafor said of his work Wednesday. “Matt’s back, so he’s going to play Sunday. I’ll just be pretty much be playing like I used to.”

A rookie third-round pick, Okorafor was often used as an extra tight end/third tackle over the first 10 games of the season.

The Steelers’ longtime starting right tackle, Marcus Gilbert, has missed the past five games because of a knee injury. Despite coach Mike Tomlin expressing optimism that Gilbert could return to practice this week, the veteran did not practice at all Wednesday.

Feiler was not even listed on the injury report. He practiced only in limited fashion last week and said coaches sat him out against the Broncos as a precaution.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.