ShareThis Page
Mike Tomlin expects Ben-Brown tandem to ‘smooth out’ inconsistencies |

Mike Tomlin expects Ben-Brown tandem to ‘smooth out’ inconsistencies

| Tuesday, October 2, 2018 5:54 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throws with receiver Antonio Brown before playing Ravens Sunday, Sept. 30, 2018 at Heinz Field.

The disconnect between Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger and Antonio Brown continued Sunday against the Baltimore Ravens when the All-Pro wide receiver was held to five catches for 62 yards.

Brown was targeted 11 times in the game, including five times in the second half when he had just one reception for five yards. The Steelers were held scoreless after halftime while the Ravens got four field goals to pull out a 26-14 win.

“We missed some opportunities in that game no doubt, particularly on possession downs” coach Mike Tomlin said Tuesday. “I’ve seen that tandem a lot of the years. They’ll smooth it out. They’ll find their rhythm.”

Roethlisberger and Brown are the most prolific passer-receiver tandem in Steelers history, and they rank among the best in the NFL. They have hooked up for 723 receptions, which ranks No. 4 on the all-time list, and 62 touchdowns, which is No. 11.

This year, it’s not for a lack of trying. Brown’s 53 targets rank second in the NFL. His 29 receptions, however, rank eighth. He also is averaging 9.4 yards per catch, a career low. His 272 receiving yards is No. 34.

“People spend a lot of time in the offseason looking to minimize tandems such as Ben and AB,” Tomlin said. “Over course of the journey, the cream rises. They’ll show what they are capable of. They’ve done it for a long time, and I anticipate that happening. While we continue to work to infuse some new targets into the mix … they’ll find their rhythm and be the formidable tandem that they are.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.