ShareThis Page
NFL Draft preview: Top 10 quarterbacks |

NFL Draft preview: Top 10 quarterbacks

Joe Rutter
| Saturday, April 14, 2018 3:31 p.m
Oklahoma quarterback Baker Mayfield (6) leaps and celebrates after he scored a touchdown against Georgia during the first half of the Rose Bowl NCAA college football game Monday, Jan. 1, 2018, in Pasadena, Calif.

1. Sam Darnold

USC, 6-3, 220

Most publications consider Darnold the No. 1 overall pick in the draft, but the Cleveland Browns rarely seem to make the logical choice. He has the size and skills required to be a top draft pick. Darnold’s downside is he threw 13 interceptions in his final year at USC, and he also fumbled 11 times.

Watch Darnold’s pre-draft workout.

2. Josh Rosen

UCLA, 6-3, 218

Darnold’s crosstown rival, Rosen threw 26 touchdowns passes last season, and his 341.5 passing yards per game ranked second in the nation. Rosen was bothered by two concussions that kept him out of two games. He also had shoulder surgery that shortened his 2016 season.

Watch Rosen’s pre-draft workout.

3. Josh Allen

Wyoming, 6-5, 237

Allen has the size and arm strength that NFL evaluators covet. He also has climbed draft boards since the NFL Combine and could supplant Darnold and Rosen as the top quarterback taken. The downside is he didn’t put up gaudy numbers at Wyoming. He had a 56 percent completion percentage and 16 touchdown passes against six interceptions last season.

Watch Allen’s pre-draft workout.

4. Baker Mayfield

Oklahoma, 6-0, 216

Mayfield is not lacking in confidence, which he made evident at the NFL Combine. He considers himself the top quarterback prospect even though his height suggests otherwise. One thing that can’t be questioned is his production. The Heisman Trophy winner, Mayfield led the nation in passing efficiency and yards per attempt. He completed 70.5 percent of his passes with 43 touchdown passes against just six interceptions.

Watch Mayfield’s pre-draft workout .

5. Lamar Jackson

Louisville, 6-2, 211

Some teams consider the 2016 Heisman Trophy winner a multi-faceted player capable of lining up at wide receiver. Jackson doesn’t agree with that assessment and is intent on playing quarterback at the highest level. In his final year at Louisville, Jackson finished third in Heisman voting after completing 59.1 percent of his passes for 3,660 yards, 27 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. He also rushed for 1,601 yards with 18 touchdowns, accounting for 405 yards of total offense per game.

Watch Jackson’s pre-draft workout

6. Mason Rudolph

Oklahoma State, 6-4, 229

Mayfield wasn’t the only quarterback from his state to light up Big 12 defenses. Rudolph completed 65 percent of his throws, and his 377 yards passing per game was tops in the nation. He finished his senior season with 37 touchdown passes and nine interceptions. One drawback is he was sacked 85 times in three seasons as a starter.

Watch Rudolph’s pre-draft workout.

7. Kyle Lauletta

Richmond, 6-3, 217

Lauletta is trying to follow in the footsteps of Carson Wentz as a quarterback making the transition from an FCS school to NFL franchise player. A three-year starter, Lauletta had a 64.9 percent completion percentage and 3,737 passing yards as a senior while throwing 28 touchdown passes and 12 interceptions. He also has the pedigree to play the position. His father, Joe, was a quarterback at Navy in the 1980s.

Watch Lauletta’s pre-draft workout.

8. Luke Falk

Washington State, 6-4, 211

The draft prospect with the most passing attempts in this class is Falk, a former walk-on who became a three-year starter at Washington State. Only one other quarterback in his class threw for more career yards. As a senior, Falk completed 67 percent of his passes for 3,593 yards, 30 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. He set many Pac-12 career records, including passing touchdowns, passing yards, completions and attempts.

Watch Falk’s pre-draft workout.

9. Mike White

Western Kentucky, 6-4, 221

White spent two years at South Florida before transferring to Western Kentucky after he was passed on the depth chart. He was the Conference USA newcomer of the year in 2016, and he passed for 4,177 yards and 26 touchdowns (with eight interceptions) in his senior year.

Watch White’s pre-draft workout.

10. Chase Litton

Marshall, 6-5, 232

Litton turned down scholarship offers from South Florida and LSU to attend Marshall. He spent most of his final three years as a starter, and he was under center for all 13 games in 2017. He completed 60 percent of his passes for 3,115 and 25 touchdowns.

Watch Litton’s pre-draft workout.

Homegrown big school

Max Browne

Pitt, 6-5, 216

Once the starter ahead of Sam Darnold at USC, Browne spent his final college season at Pitt, where he started five games last season before suffering a season-ending shoulder injury. Browne wasn’t healthy enough to attempt all of his throws at Pitt’s pro day last month, but he’s hoping to land in an NFL camp as an undrafted free agent.

Homegrown small school

Christian Strong

Seton Hill, 6-2, 212

Strong threw for 8,656 yards with 56 touchdowns at Seton Hill, and he was one of the quarterbacks invited to work out for NFL scouts at the Cal (Pa.) pro day in March. A native of Canada, Strong also participated in the CFL combine in March.

Best fit for Steelers

Mason Rudolph

All of the head honchos — Kevin Colbert, Mike Tomlin, Randy Fichtner — attended Rudolph’s pro day. They also spent time with Jackson, but Rudolph fits the mold of a pocket passer. He could be around at No. 28 overall, but with needs on defense, the Steelers are expected to pass on drafting Ben Roethlisberger’s successor.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Joe via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.