ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania ranks tied for 6th in most NFL ’18 draftees among its high school alumni |

Pennsylvania ranks tied for 6th in most NFL ’18 draftees among its high school alumni

Chris Adamski
| Monday, May 14, 2018 2:33 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Central Valley's Jordan Whitehead returns a punt for a touchdown during the first quarter against Montour on Friday, Sept. 6, 2013, in Robinson.

Only five states had more graduates of its high schools taken in the NFL draft than Pennsylvania, according to data released by USA Football on Monday.

There were 12 Pennsylvania high school alumni selected in the seven-round draft April 26-28, including two from Imhotep Charter in Philadelphia. Three former WPIAL players Jordan Whitehead (Central Valley), Troy Apke (Mt. Lebanon) and Justin Watson (South Fayette) were selected.

Georgia also boasted 12 high school alumni in the draft. Only Florida (35), California (27), Texas (27), Virginia (15) and North Carolina (14) had more.

On a per-capita basis, Mississippi and Louisiana had the most NFL draft picks in relation to their state’s total population.

Thirty-eight states — plus the District of Columbia and three internationally schooled prospects (two from Australia and one from Canada) — had at least one player drafted.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Chris via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.