Archive

ShareThis Page
Pryor takes blame for Darnold INT: ‘I let him down’ | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Pryor takes blame for Darnold INT: ‘I let him down’

240058AP18259704640283
Miami Dolphins’ Bobby McCain (28) defends New York Jets’ Terrelle Pryor during the first half of an NFL football game Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018, in East Rutherford, N.J.

If Terrelle Pryor had shortened his route, maybe cut in front of his defender a touch earlier, the first-year New York Jets wide receiver said, his team may have had a better chance to come back against the visiting Miami Dolphins Sunday.

Instead of delivering to Pryor, though, rookie quarterback Sam Darnold threw his second interception of the day and the Jets went on to lose, 20-12.

Pryor, though, took the blame for Darnold’s second pick of the day. The Jeannette grad said, “I let him down,” according to NJ.com, after the defeat moved the Jets to 1-1.

The Jets had just cut the deficit to 20-6 early in the second half and had the ball back following a turnover at the Dolphins’ 12-yard line. But Xavier Howard stepped in front of Pryor in the back of the end zone to take away the Jets’ momentum and rob Pryor of his first touchdown with New York.

“I said it to him after the game, ‘I hope you forgive me,” Pryor told ESPN.com. “I’ll make sure I’m there next time.’ That one, it’s not on Sam and I wish it could go on a stat for me.”

Jetswire.com reported Pryor wasn’t running full speed on his route and Darnold threw to a spot where he expected Pryor to be.

The Jets are Pryor’s sixth NFL team. The former Ohio State quarterback, who began his pro career under center before switching positions in 2015, had four receptions for 84 yards in Sunday’s loss.

Bill Beckner is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bill at [email protected] or via Twitter @BillBeckner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.