Ravens’ defense comes unglued after strong start against Steelers |

Ravens’ defense comes unglued after strong start against Steelers

Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
Steelers running back LeGarrette Blount runs through Ravens defenders during the first quarter Sunday, Nov. 2, 2014, at Heinz Field.

Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs watched from afar the Steelers’ six touchdowns throws a week ago.

To him, these six were more unbelievable.

For the second time in two weeks, Ben Roethlisberger threw six touchdowns in a game Sunday. But these six came in a 43-23 victory over a Baltimore defense that had battered the Steelers quarterback in Week 2.

“You could have never sold me that during the week,” Suggs said. “That’s a reflection on us all.”

The Ravens allowed only 55 rushing yards. But Roethlisberger was 25 of 37 for 340 passing yards with no interceptions, far different than his one-interception, no-touchdown stat line from Week 2 vs. the Ravens. His touchdown throws covered 5, 19, 47, 54, 18 and 33 yards.

“He wasn’t doing anything differently,” Suggs said. “They were just making plays. I guess once you get in that groove, it is what it is. He made some plays. His receivers made some plays for him. And he played a phenomenal game.”

It didn’t start phenomenally.

The Steelers went three-and-out on their first three possessions. The fourth possession stalled when the Ravens sacked Roethlisberger on three consecutive snaps. Facing fourth-and-39 at the 12, they punted for the fourth time.

But after that, this wasn’t the same Ravens defense from Week 2.

In that 26-6 Steelers loss, Baltimore forced two fumbles, Haloti Ngata had an interception, Elvis Dumervil had two sacks and Courtney Upshaw drew a fine for blasting Roethlisberger.

Upshaw earned another roughing-the-passing penalty, but the similarities mostly ended there.

With 5:33 left, defensive end DeAngelo Tyson recovered the only Ravens takeaway, a fumbled snap. But the Steelers already led 36-17.

The Steelers scored quickly Sunday with their first three touchdown drives lasting less than two minutes apiece. The longest of the six scoring drives needed only a little more than four minutes.

The fastest was a five-play, 80-yard drive that took just 51 seconds. The second-quarter possession ended with a 47-yard touchdown catch by Markus Wheaton. On the five others, the Steelers covered 27 yards in 1:56, 30 yards in 1:31, 71 yards in 4:16, 85 yards in 3:38 and 40 yards in 1:07.

The Steelers had only 49 yards in the first quarter, but two second-quarter turnovers put the Ravens in a bind. Both left a short field for Roethlisberger, who scored quickly each time.

“You have to go out there and stop him no matter the situation,” Suggs said. “We didn’t respond well when bad things started happening. We’ve just got to be better.”

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.