ShareThis Page
Ryan Shazier on new NFL tackling rule his injury inspired: adjusting to it will be difficult |

Ryan Shazier on new NFL tackling rule his injury inspired: adjusting to it will be difficult

Chris Adamski
| Wednesday, June 6, 2018 2:42 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Referee Walt Anderson checks on Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier after he was injured during the first quarter against the Bengals Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier speaks to the media Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin takes a moment with Ryan Shazier during the first day of OTA practice on Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Some have called it The Ryan Shazier Rule. But the man whose injury inspired it has lukewarm thoughts about the NFL’s newest regulation governing tackling.

Rule 12, Section 2, Article 8 was passed by unanimous vote at the league meetings in March: “It is a foul if a player lowers his head to initiate and make contact with his helmet against an opponent.” Doing so will result in a 15-yatrd penalty and possible ejection.

It was during a Dec. 4 game in Cincinnati that Shazier suffered a spinal injury that cost him at least the remainder of the 2017 season and the full 2018 season. Under the new rule, Shazier would have been flagged for the tackle on Bengals receiver Joe Malone.

The rule is designed to protect the tacklers from injury such as the one Shazier underwent. While Shazier understands that, he sees difficulty in asking defensive players to adjust to a new style of tackling.

“Honestly I have been playing football when I was 4, so some of the hits that I did were some of the same ones I’ve had since I was 10 years old,” Shazier said Wednesday during his first news conference since the injury.

“So it’s kind of hard when they are trying to tell you to avoid hitting a certain way because at the end of the day, a lot of people who are playing this game have been probably playing it since before they could really speak full sentences, and honestly it’s a little hard.

“But you just have to start playing the way they want you to play, start tackling more with your shoulders, I guess, and just to completely avoid people’s upper half. At the end of the day it’s kind of hard if somebody is coming at you a certain way – but you have just go play the way they want you to.”

At the outset of organized team activities late last month, many Steelers players endorsed the new rule, although most said it would take an adjustment period .

Shazier’s teammate and Steelers defensive captain Cameron Heyward on Wednesday endorsed the rule but also opined how it would be called.

“Those are things we preach in Little League: ‘Keep your head up. Tackle with your shoulder pads. We don’t want our helmet to be used as a violent weapon,'” Heyward said. “I would just say along with that, you look for the ways their going to call it. It’s going to be you get a running back and a linebacker in open grass (or) when the guard is pulling when he can’t lower his head anymore, it’s going to be hard to call it right in line because there is so much going on there.

“But you want to take those hits out because they don’t benefit anybody.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Chris via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.