Starkey: Bradshaw’s legacy underappreciated |

Starkey: Bradshaw’s legacy underappreciated

Maybe it’s because he decided to become a professional buffoon after his playing days. Maybe it’s because many in these parts regard him as a phony.

Maybe it’s because his career numbers — at least when applied to the E-ZPass modern game — look so pedestrian. Maybe it’s because there were so many other great players on the Steelers teams of the 1970s.

Whatever the reason, it seems Terry Bradshaw barely makes it into the conversation of best big-game quarterback of the Super Bowl era. It seems the mainstream conversation now begins and ends with Tom Brady and Joe Montana.

Bradshaw belongs in that conversation.

Not as the greatest quarterback of all-time, mind you, but certainly as the greatest big-game quarterback.

Those six silver trophies behind glass on the South Side might be four or fewer if not for Bradshaw’s go-for-broke guts and precision.

His final seven Super Bowl touchdown passes went for an average of 44.6 yards. Brady, for all his greatness, needs about 32 completions to get 40 yards.

Give me one game to save the world, with any Super Bowl-era quarterback in his prime, and I’ll gladly take Bradshaw.

Remember, Bradshaw had to call his own plays. He didn’t have the benefit of an offensive mastermind of a coach (say, Bill Walsh) or an expert quarterbacks coach (the position didn’t exist in a refined form back then, although Chuck Noll broke new ground by hiring Babe Parilli). He dealt with defensive backs legally mauling his receivers until 1978 and pass-rushers legally trying to maim him.

People forget, too, that Bradshaw was a bull of a runner (2,257 yards, 5.1 yards per attempt and 32 touchdowns).

Most importantly, though, he was the greatest big-game, deep-ball passer I have ever seen.

Two examples:

• Bradshaw steps up at his 19 and fires a gorgeous lob into John Stallworth’s hands at the Los Angeles Rams 32 with a title on the line in Super Bowl XIV, resulting in a 73-yard touchdown.

• Bradshaw unleashing from his 30 — just as he absorbs a concussion-causing hit — and places a perfect bomb onto Lynn Swann’s fingertips at the Dallas 6 in Super Bowl X. Couldn’t have been more accurate if he’d walked up and placed the ball in Swann’s hands.

Who else does that?

Do the Steelers win without that throw?

If it’s numbers you crave, try these: four and six. As in, four Super Bowl titles in six years.

No other quarterback can claim that.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.