ShareThis Page
Starkey: Steelers need ‘Good’ Ben |

Starkey: Steelers need ‘Good’ Ben

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger eludes the Browns' Paul Kruger to throw a touchdown pass to Markus Wheaton during the fourth quarter Sunday, Jan. 3, 2016, in Cleveland.

I can’t get this Marvin Lewis “exorcism” quote out of my mind.

Lewis, the Cincinnati Bengals coach-who’s-never-won-a-playoff-game, said it’s time to slay the demons against the Steelers.

“It’s time to right the ship,” Lewis told reporters Sunday. “You know, exorcism.”

I keep picturing Lewis, if the Bengals win, going to midfield with his head turned all the way round and shaking Mike Tomlin’s hand.

But that’s my problem. It’s one way to analyze this game, too — from the psychological perspective (suffice to say, the Steelers are so far in the Bengals’ heads it would take the Jaws of Life to pry them loose).

You could break it down a thousand different ways. I keep coming back to the quarterback matchup: Ben Roethlisberger versus Katherine Webb-McCarron’s husband AJ.

That is why the Steelers are favored.

That is why the Steelers should win.

But there’s a nagging question here. A fair one, too: Which Ben will the Steelers get Saturday?

Over the past two seasons, we’ve often seen one of two extremes: Historically Spectacular Ben (six touchdown passes on consecutive weeks) or Reckless Ben (remember the Baltimore game nine days ago?).

Sometimes both emerge on the same day.

Remember the Cleveland game two days ago?

It seems Historically Spectacular Ben becomes too emboldened. Too convinced that he can and should attempt any throw at any time, usually with an eye downfield.

Last season, Roethlisberger staged possibly the greatest back-to-back passing days in NFL history, throwing for 12 touchdowns against the Colts and Ravens. He then inexplicably faltered against three of the league’s weakest defenses (Jets, Titans, Saints).

This season, we saw him light up several teams, notably the stingy Denver Broncos. But we also saw him plummet to Matt Schaub levels in two monumental divisional losses (home against Cincinnati, at Baltimore), throwing five interceptions and leading the offense to just 27 total points.

Roethlisberger’s overall numbers reflect the mercurial nature of his performance. He was No. 1 in the league in passing yards per game and fourth in completion percentage. On the other hand, of quarterbacks who started at least 10 games, he had by far the worst interception percentage (3.41). Nobody else who started 10 games was above 3.0.

After Sunday’s game, Roethlisberger said the Steelers “need to be perfect” in the playoffs.

They really don’t. Not this weekend. And he doesn’t have to shoot for Historically Spectacular, even if he gets nothing from the ground game. He merely needs to be Good Ben, the Ben we saw in the win at Cincinnati.

On that day, Good Ben didn’t throw for 300 yards or any touchdowns. He merely controlled the game, completing 30 of 39 passes for 282 yards and only one mistake — a deep shot into double coverage with the Steelers in control late.

“Good” Ben mostly took what was given, used the middle of the field (10 catches for Heath Miller), accepted a sack when appropriate and settled for field goals when prudent.

Here’s the deal with the Bengals: They typically rush four and drop seven into coverage. The idea is to tempt Reckless Ben into taking chances, and the Bengals have experienced some success there. They have intercepted Roethlisberger 10 times in their past eight meetings (he is 5-3 in those games, with 10 TD passes).

Free safety Reggie Nelson alone has picked off five Roethlisberger throws, three of them factoring majorly into Bengals victories.

On the other side, while AJ McCarron isn’t liable to win the game single-handedly, he likely will be under strict orders not to lose it. He had zero interceptions in his three starts after a rough relief outing against the Steelers, who are 0-5 when they lose the turnover differential.

Roethlisberger, great as he is, has seen his big-game reputation fade some. In his past five playoff games, he has six touchdowns and seven interceptions. That doesn’t include a de facto playoff game against the Bengals in 2012, when Reckless Ben completed only half his passes and was picked off twice — once by Nelson on an insane throw that set up the Bengals’ winning field goal.

Before it’s over, the Steelers might need Historically Spectacular Ben. This weekend, Good Ben will do.

Good Ben will get you to Denver.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.