Steelers 1st-round pick Terrell Edmunds on his NFL debut: ‘Personally, I feel like I played good’ |

Steelers 1st-round pick Terrell Edmunds on his NFL debut: ‘Personally, I feel like I played good’

This is a 2018 photo of Terrell Edmunds of the Pittsburgh Steelers NFL football team. This image reflects the Pittsburgh Steelers active roster as of Thursday, May 10, 2018 when this image was taken. (AP Photo)

It wasn’t the NFL debut that the Pittsburgh Steelers’ prior first-round pick on the same Cleveland field 364 days prior. But for Terrell Edmunds, he’ll take it – personally, at least.

“Personally, I feel like I played good,” said Edmunds, the safety whom the Steelers drafted at No. 28 overall in April. “But we didn’t get the win, so there’s still work to do.

“It was fun game, a good game (to be his first). We didn’t get the outcome that we wanted, but we’ve got stuff to do to improve.”

A year after 2017 first-round pick T.J. Watt has two sacks and an interception in his first NFL game (also at FirstEnergy Stadium), Edmunds’ debut was not as splashy. He was not credited with a tackle but had a quarterback hit and a pass defended.

Edmunds started his first game, becoming just the seventh Steelers rookie to start the opening game of a season since 1974. Edmunds played 74 of the Steelers’ 89 defensive snaps.

He was used as the team’s primary strong safety in most packages, though at times he appeared to be playing more of a hybrid linebacker spot.

Edmunds said he did not have any lapses in communication nor in understanding his role in what has evolved into a Steelers’ defensive scheme that employs several hybrid packages.

“We already had four games already; the preseason games, you’ve got to count those, so this wasn’t the first time out there,” Edmunds said.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.