ShareThis Page
Steelers’ Antonio Brown: Ben Roethlisberger doesn’t need to apologize |

Steelers’ Antonio Brown: Ben Roethlisberger doesn’t need to apologize

TAMPA, Fla. – Ben Roethlisberger slammed his helmet to the ground, then apologized to wide receiver Antonio Brown for his public display of emotion late in the Steelers’ 30-27 win over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Monday night.

Roethlisberger was upset about an apparent miscommunication that resulted in an incompletion on a third-and-9 pass play with 3:26 remaining and the Steelers clinging to a three-point lead.

Brown kept running down the field while Roethlisberger’s pass dropped to the ground near the sideline. The Steelers had to punt. When Roethlisberger got to the sideline, he removed his helmet and banged it on the ground.

Roethlisberger opened his press conference by apologizing to Brown “for showing a little bit too much emotion.”

Roethlisberger also approached Brown in the locker room, leaned down and whispered something in the star wide receiver’s ear.

When informed that Roethlisberger openly apologized to him, Brown said, “For what?”

“Ben is a competitor,” Brown added. “He loves me. There’s no apology. Nobody playing this game is perfect.”

In the first two games of the season, Brown had 18 catches but on 33 targets from Roethlisberger. On Monday, Brown caught his first six targets for 50 yards and a touchdown.

Brown appreciated his quarterback’s gesture.

“He always makes me feel good communicating with me,” Brown said. “It’s like when your wife tells you that you look strong getting the groceries. It makes you want to get more groceries.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown celebrates after his 27-yard score against the Buccaneers during the first half Monday, Sept. 24, 2018, in Tampa, Fla.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.