ShareThis Page
Steelers’ Antonio Brown on Le’Veon Bell: ‘No one wins when the family feuds’ |

Steelers’ Antonio Brown on Le’Veon Bell: ‘No one wins when the family feuds’

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown celebrates his touchdown catch with Le'Veon Bell during the first quarter against the Colts Thursday, Nov. 24, 2016, at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis.

Antonio Brown said he hasn’t been in touch with Le’Veon Bell all summer. But the Pittsburgh Steelers’ star receiver isn’t willing to say he takes offense to how the star running back is handling his contract situation.

“Everyone got their own personal business with the game,” Brown said Friday, “and that’s just everyone’s personal business.”

Unlike at least three of the Steelers’ offensive linemen earlier this week, Brown wasn’t willing to admonish Bell for not signing his $14.5 million franchise tag tender and reporting to the team in time for Sunday’s regular-season opener.

“No one wins when the family feuds,” Brown said. “At the end of the day, we are a family. If he’s here or he’s not, we want the best for him. That’s what it’s all about; it’s not about pointing fingers and fighting amongst each other. We are a (close-knit) group; we respect and love each other, regardless of the situation.”

But is Bell still part of the family?

“When he comes, he will be a part.”

Will the Steelers survive and thrive without Bell playing?

“As long as we’ve got ‘7’ (Ben Roethlisberger) and the o-line, I think we got a great chance to win every game.”

Are Bell’s decisions – and the controversy surrounding it – hurting the Steelers?

“Everyone got their own personal business; my business is to be the best guy here. Employee 84 is here ready to work, no one else matters.”

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.