ShareThis Page
Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger, Mike Tomlin agree Martavis Bryant seems focused, happy |

Steelers’ Ben Roethlisberger, Mike Tomlin agree Martavis Bryant seems focused, happy

Joe Rutter
| Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:03 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger celebrates with receiver Martavis Bryant after a long completion against the Bengals during the third quarter of their AFC wild-card game Saturday, Jan. 9, 2016, in Cincinnati.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Martavis Bryant looks to avoid the Chiefs' Marcus Peters in the first quarter Sunday, Oct. 15, 2017 at Arrowhead Stadium.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Mike Mitchell is pushed by teammate Anthony Chickilo and hits the legs of Chiefs quarterback Alex Smith on Sunday, Oct. 15, 2017, at Arrowhead Stadium.

Mike Tomlin has witnessed his share of off-field drama this season, the national anthem controversy in Chicago being the biggest inferno among the fires seemingly engulfing the Steelers on a weekly basis.

That was followed by Antonio Brown’s bout with a Gatorade cooler in Baltimore and Ben Roethlisberger’s flippant response that “maybe I don’t have it anymore” after a five-interception outing against Jacksonville.

Then came the Martavis Bryant trade report following the Steelers’ 19-13 win at Kansas City on Sunday night, which the Steelers coach equated to a smolder more than a flaming combustion on the incineration scale.

“I don’t know that this is a legitimate distraction,” Tomlin said Tuesday at his weekly news conference. “Martavis has been very open about the fact that it’s a non-issue for him. We believe him, so we’re moving forward.”

Bryant addressed the NFL Network report Monday, saying he did not request a trade and is happy playing for the Steelers.

Tomlin said Bryant did not come to him expressing any displeasure with the team.

“I’ve had good, fluid communication with Martavis throughout this process, like I have with other players,” Tomlin said. “He was a big contributor to our efforts on Sunday. He was excited like everybody else. I don’t know where these reports come from. Sometimes they come from family members or people close to them. Sometimes they come from agents.

“I don’t judge him or my relationship with him based on things said by others. He appears to be happy and focused.”

The report coincided with Bryant playing a season-low 52 percent of the offensive snaps against Kansas City. Bryant had two receptions on three targets for 27 yards. For the season, he has caught 17 of 34 targets for 231 yards and a touchdown.

After six games in his first season back from a yearlong suspension for violating the NFL’s substance-abuse policy, Bryant is fourth on the Steelers in receptions, with one fewer catch than tight end Jesse James and two more receptions than rookie receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster.

Bryant played 33 snaps, compared to Smith-Schuster’s 44, against the Chiefs.

“I think he’s doing great,” Tomlin said. “We’ve outlined this pretty regularly over recent weeks. I like where he is. He’s acknowledging that getting back on the train is a process.”

Bryant is averaging 13.6 yards per reception, which is about four yards fewer than his average in his first two NFL seasons. He also has just one of the Steelers’ seven receiving touchdowns this season. He had 14 in his first 21 NFL games.

“Obviously, his numbers aren’t what he was hoping and expecting,” quarterback Ben Roethlisberger said on his weekly 93.7 FM radio segment. “He’s been gone for a whole year. It’s not like he missed four games, six games, eight games. It’s been a whole year. That’s tough. I’m happy to have him back as a teammate, a football player, and I’m excited for what is going to come for him down the road.”

Any dissatisfaction with his role in the offense would keep Bryant in line with the team’s other two playmaking stars, Brown and running back Le’Veon Bell. Brown’s attack on the Gatorade cooler came after Roethlisberger didn’t target him on a third-down pass. Last week, Bell indicated the Steelers weren’t running the ball enough.

Coincidence or not, Bell and Brown are the first teammates in NFL history with at least 700 scrimmage yards apiece through six games. Bell has 706 and Brown 700. Perhaps Bryant merely wants a piece of the action.

“I assume all of those guys down there want that,” Tomlin said. “I don’t think that’s earth-shattering or ground-breaking news when people want the ball or want more playing time or want more clarity in terms of their roles. I think those are natural human conditions. I’m surprised when they don’t want those things.”

Like Tomlin, Roethlisberger hasn’t seen a trace of dissatisfaction or lack of effort from Bryant.

“None whatsoever,” he said. “A matter of fact, this week I thought he gave more effort in the run game, in blocking for other guys.”

Blocking is an area in which Smith-Schuster has impressed coaches, and it has contributed to his increased playing time.

Tomlin said Bryant is improving as a blocker.

“Week in and week out, he’s playing faster and gaining more detail in his execution,” he said. “I think it’s reasonable to expect that because he’s been working hard.”

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Joe via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.