Steelers’ Chris Boswell takes blame for missed field goals in loss |

Steelers’ Chris Boswell takes blame for missed field goals in loss

Kevin Gorman
Pittsburgh Steelers kicker Chris Boswell (9) slips on the turf while attempting a field goal against the Oakland Raiders during the second half of an NFL football game in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Dec. 9, 2018. (AP Photo/D. Ross Cameron)

OAKLAND, Calif. — Chris Boswell had a chance to kick the tying field goal in the final seconds, one that would have redeemed an earlier miss for the Pittsburgh Steelers placekicker.

Boswell slipped and, metaphorically, fell flat on his face.

So did the Steelers in a 24-21 loss to the Oakland Raiders on Sunday at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, the worst loss of the season for a team that holds a half-game lead in the AFC North.

“What happened was the ball didn’t go through,” Boswell said, “and we lost the game.”

Boswell’s 40-yard attempt with five seconds left was his sixth missed field goal this season. He also had a 39-yarder that could have tied the score 10-10 in the second quarter sail wide right. Boswell hasn’t been much better on extra points, missing five and having one bounce off the right upright but through the goalposts against the Raiders.

Neither Boswell nor Steelers coach Mike Tomlin would blame the slick field conditions for losing his footing.

“If it was slippery for us, it was slippery for them, also,” Tomlin said. “I’m not going to make field conditions an excuse. It was slippery for everyone.”

Boswell echoed Tomlin’s take: “The field’s the field. You can’t complain about it. You can’t blame it. It was as bad as it is for me as anybody else. You’ve just got to find a way to put it through.”

Boswell kicked four winning field goals last season, including three as time expired. But his missed kicks have proven costly for the Steelers this season. Boswell missed a potential winning field goal in overtime at Cleveland in the opener, which ended in a tie, and an extra point that could have given the Steelers a 17-point lead against the Chargers last week, which ended in a loss.

So much for Boswell having a strong follow-up to a Pro Bowl season in 2017 that was rewarded with a five-year, $20-million contract.

“It’s terrible,” Boswell said of his performance this season. “What else do you want me to say?”

Where Tomlin wouldn’t say anything about Boswell’s future with the Steelers, Boswell couldn’t do anything but absorb the blame for another missed kick that played a pivotal role in another close loss.

“It’s definitely a lot of heat on you, but this is not the first time in my life this has happened. I’ve got to find a way through,” Boswell said. “You’ve got to keep going. Every kicker, every player, every position goes through a downfall. You’ve just got to find your footing and get back up. Just like any other slump in the world, you’ve just got to keep shooting, keep kicking, keep doing what you’re doing. You got here for a reason.”

Tomlin called the missed field goals “disappointing” but refused to elaborate on Boswell’s status with the Steelers.

“He’s not the only one that’s disappointed,” Boswell said. “This is a business. You’re valued or looked at on results, and I’m not getting it done right now. Whatever happens from here happens.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin at [email protected] or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.