Steelers’ Eli Rogers suspended for violating substance abuse policy |

Steelers’ Eli Rogers suspended for violating substance abuse policy

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Eli Rogers fields a punt during practice Sunday, July 30, 2017 at Latrobe High School.

Injured Pittsburgh Steelers receiver Eli Rogers received a one-game suspension for violating the NFL’s substance-abuse program.

Rogers is on the physically unable to perform list as he rehabilitates from a torn ACL in his right knee suffered during the January playoff loss to the Jacksonville Jaguars. He almost certainly would not have been added to the active roster in time for the regular-season opener.

The suspension will cover the Week 1 game at Cleveland and take effect eight days prior. During that time span, Rogers will be permitted to continue rehab and attend meetings with the team at its South Side headquarters. He will not be able to practice, but if Rogers is still on the PUP list, that would be the case anyway.

“We are disappointed that Eli Rogers has been suspended for Week 1 of the regular season as part of the NFL Policy and Program for Substances of Abuse,” Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said in a statement.

Rogers was not tendered a contract in the spring but was signed by the Steelers on the day they reported to training camp at Saint Vincent. An undrafted free agent out of Louisville who spent his rookie 2015 season on injured reserve, Rogers won the slot receiver job the following season (48 catches, three touchdowns) but slid down the depth chart last season.

Rogers had 18 catches for 149 yards and a touchdown in 2017.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.