ShareThis Page
Steelers injury updates: David DeCastro ‘didn’t feel good,’ two other linemen did not practice |

Steelers injury updates: David DeCastro ‘didn’t feel good,’ two other linemen did not practice

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers offensive guard David DeCastro during practice Sunday, July 29, 2018 at Saint Vincent College.

David DeCastro was eager to test out his fractured hand during Pittsburgh Steelers practice Wednesday. It didn’t go well – so poorly that DeCastro didn’t even both trying Thursday.

DeCastro did not sound optimistic about his chances of playing Monday night at Tampa Bay. The All Pro guard missed Sunday’s game – the first he’d missed because of injury since 2013 – after suffering (and playing through) a hand fracture in Week 1.

After not practicing at all last week, DeCastro confirmed he left Wednesday’s practice early after realizing that his trial run of testing out the hand showed him he couldn’t continue.

“It was frustrating,” DeCastro said. “You’ve got to kind of see where you’re at. Sometimes it doesn’t go the way you want it to go, so you’ve just got to take it day by day, it’s tough and it’s tough seeing guys out there without you.”

DeCastro said that his hand “didn’t feel good” and that he’s “taking it day by day.”

Making matters worse is that he wasn’t the only offensive lineman who missed practice Thursday, albeit Maurkice Pouncey’s off day was not injury related. Right tackle Marcus Gilbert missed because of a hamstring injury.

In other injury news, safety Morgan Burnett (groin) was limited at practice and reserve defensive lineman Tyson Alualu (shoulder) was a full participant after he missed a game because of injury Sunday for the first time in his nine-year career.

Ramon Foster (knee) was a full practice participant.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.