ShareThis Page
Steelers notebook: Big Ben listed as probable, on track to play against Colts |

Steelers notebook: Big Ben listed as probable, on track to play against Colts

Chris Adamski
| Friday, December 4, 2015 7:36 p.m

Ben Roethlisberger was a full participant in practice Friday and is listed as probable for Sunday night’s game against the Indianapolis Colts at Heinz Field.

The Steelers quarterback did not miss any practice time this week.

Roethlisberger left the field before the final drive of last Sunday’s game in Seattle because of blurred peripheral vision. He was entered into the NFL’s concussion protocol.

Despite confusion earlier this week over results of baseline cognitive testing he underwent, Roethlisberger is on track to play Sunday.

Roethlisberger had a career-high 522 passing yards and tied a career high with six touchdown passes in a 51-34 win against the Colts last season.

Shazier also probable

Inside linebacker Ryan Shazier, who suffered a concussion last week against the Seahawks, also is listed as probable for the Colts game. Shazier, whose concussion was more obvious and easily diagnosed, was limited in practice Wednesday but was a full participant Thursday and Friday.

Shazier’s status is good news for a thinning inside linebacker corps — backup Sean Spence did not practice for the second consecutive day and will not play Sunday. He injured a hamstring against the Seahawks.

Other players who are considered probable after practicing Friday are linebacker James Harrison (knee), receiver Martavis Bryant (hip) and safeties Will Allen (ankle) and Mike Mitchell (knee).

The only practice time all week for tight end Heath Miller came in limited fashion Friday. Miller, who suffered a rib injury last week, is listed as questionable against the Colts.

Health/safety survey

Friday’s practice was an hour earlier than usual to accommodate a league-wide administering of a players survey by the NFL and its union.

The questions ranged from concussion protocol to locker room cleanliness.

“Just various questions on the survey regarding … how seriously players take concussions or the medical staff or … going through the right protocols,” linebacker Jarvis Jones said.

“(And) questions about the different medical things. Are the facilities clean? Do you have soap? All the towels clean? Just … various different questions (about) the facilities here and other places we play.”

Wheaton keeps focus

It was turning into a disappointing season for Markus Wheaton. Over the seven games before last Sunday, Wheaton had nine catches for 135 yards.

Against the Seahawks he had nine catches for 201 yards.

Wheaton said keeping a level head throughout the season helped contribute to the career day.

“Just staying focused — being able to stay focused throughout not seeing as many balls as a receiver,” Wheaton said. “You want to catch balls, you want to score touchdowns — that’s any receiver. I think being able to stay focused, despite that, is extremely tough, and I’m glad I was able to.”

Win out?

The Steelers find themselves in eighth place in the AFC, and only six teams qualify for the postseason.

Their margin for error might have evaporated. It might not be “must-win” yet, but guard Ramon Foster said the Steelers know the only way to be comfortably assured they will make the playoffs is to win their five remaining games.

“You never know how this thing’s going to fall,” Foster said. “One thing we can’t count on is other teams getting us in the playoffs.”

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Chris via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.