ShareThis Page
Steelers notebook: Short-yardage back Terrell Watson upset with performance vs. Bengals |

Steelers notebook: Short-yardage back Terrell Watson upset with performance vs. Bengals

Chris Adamski
| Monday, October 23, 2017 8:06 p.m
Chaz Palla
Steelers running back Terrell Watson had a game-high 40 yards on eight carries in the second half against the Colts.

Terrell Watson knows he has one job.

“And I take it very personally,” the Steelers running back said Monday. “Very seriously.”

Watson had performed his duties quite well, too, this season. Until Sunday.

The Steelers’ short-yardage specialist, Watson was stopped on fourth-and-1 on the first play of the fourth quarter against Cincinnati. Officials initially credited Watson with a first down but overturned the call after the Bengals challenged the ruling.

“It kind of got to me a little bit,” Watson said. “But things happen.

“I’ve got to make it where you can’t challenge it and it’s (indisputable).”

That particular play wasn’t the only one in which the Steelers had issues in short-yardage, but it was the only one in which Watson can shoulder any of the blame. It was his only carry — the Steelers chose to have Le’Veon Bell on the field for two of their three third-and-1 snaps.

Bell’s lone carry in that situation lost 4 yards. On the other two occasions, the Steelers threw a long pass to Antonio Brown. Both were incomplete.

The 0-for-4 performance on third- or fourth-and-1s ruined what had been a 4-for-5 start to the season on such occasions. And it was the first time on four such plays in which Watson was not successful.

“I have to move my feet more,” Watson said. “Gotta get it. Gotta do my job, you know? Disappointed, yeah. But it just lights a fire under me, and I’m not going to be denied. Get back to work this week and do it all over again.”

Watson’s other role on the team is as kickoff returner. He is averaging 20.2 yards on five returns this season.

McDonald injured, involved

A day after he did not play in the second half because of a knee injury, tight end Vance McDonald was moving without a limp and did not have a wrap or bandage on either of his knees.

Though he declined to speculate on his status for Sunday night’s game in Detroit — he referred inquires to coach Mike Tomlin — McDonald acknowledged feeling gratified he’s become an increasing part of the offense.

He had three catches over the past two games, including receptions for 26 and 28 yards, respectively. McDonald’s usage as a blocker also increased as the Steelers turned to more two-tight end sets.

“The last few weeks, our focus has been getting the run game going,” McDonald said. “It opens it up a lot of things. When you get defensive guys out of position playing run-heavy and change the way they are entering the game, it’s huge for the offenses.”

AB not included

Antonio Brown was a bystander during rookie JuJu Smith-Schuster’s hide-and-seek touchdown celebration with Le’Veon Bell. Brown watched as Smith-Schuster covered his eyes, and Bell hid behind the goal post.

“He was the parent on that one,” Smith-Schuster said, laughing. “He was making sure we were playing safe.”

Bell and Smith-Schuster concocted the celebration about 10 minutes before kickoff, which explains why Brown wasn’t included.

“He just didn’t know at the moment,” Smith-Schuster said.

Paying up

Steelers reserve offensive tackle and LSU alumnus Jerald Hawkins made Ole Miss alums Mike Hilton and Lavon Hooks put on LSU shirts and pose for a photo in the Steelers’ locker room Monday, possibly payment a bet for this past Saturday’s game between the two schools.

LSU won at Ole Miss, 40-24. Hilton was a cornerback for the Rebels from 2012-15, and Hooks was a defensive tackle there in 2013-14. Hawkins was at LSU from 2012-15, going 2-2 against SEC West rival Ole Miss.

Staff writer Joe Rutter contributed. Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review steelers reporter. You can contact Chris via Twitter .

Categories: Steelers
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.