Steelers notes: TE Vance McDonald ‘hoping’ to play this week, plus snap-count observations |

Steelers notes: TE Vance McDonald ‘hoping’ to play this week, plus snap-count observations

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers tight end Vance McDonald with a catch during practice Thursday, July 26, 2018 at Staint Vincent College.

Vance McDonald walked out of the Pittsburgh Steelers locker room Monday without a limp or the use of sort of wrap or other device on his injured foot. After missing the regular-season opener Sunday in Cleveland, will McDonald be ready for the home opener against Kansas City this coming week?

“Hoping for it,” McDonald said.

McDonald hasn’t made it through a full practice since the first week of training camp in late July. Since being acquired by the Steelers 12 ½ months ago, he’s missed seven of 17 regular-season games because of injury.

**Snap decisions**

Some notable snap counts from the Steelers’ Week 1 tie at Cleveland, as provided by the league:

—James Conner played all but seven of the 84 snaps on offense

—The receivers’ snap counts went as follows: Antonio Brown, 83; JuJu Smith-Schuster, 63; Justin Hunter, 51; James Washington, 11; Ryan Switzer, 7 (some at running back); Darrius Heyward-Bey, one.

—In “big” packages, fullback Roosevelt Nix played 19 snaps and rookie Chuks Okorafor played 17 as an extra tackle/tight end.

—Inside linebacker Vince Williams played all but one of the 89 defensive snaps

—A lot was made of the safety usage during camp. In the first regular season games, here are the safeties snap counts: Sean Davis, 89; Terrell Edmunds, 74; Morgan Burnett, 40. Jordan Dangerfield, Nat Berhe and Marcus Allen (inactive) did not play any snaps on defense.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.