ShareThis Page
Steelers players come to LeBeau’s defense |

Steelers players come to LeBeau’s defense

| Thursday, November 7, 2013 10:30 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
Steelers defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau looks on during OTAs June 7, 2012, at Heinz Field.

In the aftermath of a 55-31 loss at New England, the Steelers’ usually reliable defense has faced intense scrutiny, and defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau finds himself in the crosshair of criticism.

It’s an unusual predicament for the stoic LeBeau, whose defense has been No. 1 in the NFL five times during the past decade, including an 8-8 season in 2012.

When asked if LeBeau is at fault, safety Troy Polamalu said, “It depends on who you’re asking. Not in my opinion.”

For the most part, the players hold themselves accountable. They insisted that LeBeau’s game plans are effective, but they have failed to execute them properly.

“Somebody has to take the blame,” linebacker LaMarr Woodley said. “That’s just the way it is when you’re having a bad season. Last season I was the one to take the blame. It comes with the territory. Now people want to blame the defensive coordinator.”

“There’s nothing anyone can say outside our group about coach LeBeau that bothers us,” safety Ryan Clark said. “We know what kind of man he is. We know want kind of work he puts into us not just as football players but as men. We don’t have to defend him. His resume speaks for itself.”

While the offense has struggled to generate points, the defense has played well enough to keep the team within striking distance in most games. That, of course, was until Sunday, when the defense withered amid a 31-7 Patriots barrage to close the game.

“The bottom line is we have to keep the score where our guys have a chance to win it,” LeBeau said Thursday. “We clearly did not do that (against New England).”

The Steelers, ranked 12th defensively this week, will try to turn things around against the Buffalo Bills (3-6) on Sunday at Heinz Field.

“We don’t have the luxury of hindsight,” LeBeau said. “We had a very good week of practice. You will see an improvement.”

The Patriots exposed every weakness of the Steelers’ defense. Just when the unit thought it had figured out how Oakland quarterback Terrelle Pryor covered 93 yards for a touchdown, it surrendered a franchise-record 610 yards of offense to the Patriots.

LeBeau said the problem was a breakdown in fundamentals. The Steelers often were in the wrong places at the right time, and Tom Brady torched them for 432 yards and four touchdowns.

“We’ve gotten away from (fundamentals), and that’s on me,” LeBeau said. “We’re leaving too many windows, and we’re going to close the windows.”

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.